variables from your model are also going to be untrusted. That means that if
your code interacts with the filesystem, network, etc. and uses checkpointed
variables as part of those interactions (ex: using a string variable to build a
filesystem path), a maliciously created checkpoint might be able to change the
targets of those operations, which could result in arbitrary
read/write/executions.

### Running a TensorFlow server

            mergePlugin_Executions(builder, target, source, sourceDominant, context);
            mergePlugin_Dependencies(builder, target, source, sourceDominant, context);
            return builder.build();
        }

        @Override
        protected void mergeReporting_Plugins(
                Reporting.Builder builder,
                Reporting target,
                Reporting source,

        val validSubprojects = model.subprojects.getSubprojectsForFunctionalTest(testCoverage)

        // Build project not found, don't split into buckets
        val subProjectToClassTimes: MutableMap<String, List<TestClassTime>> =

    protected long cacheDuration = 10; // min

    @Resource
    public void init() {
        xpathAPICache =
                CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterAccess(cacheDuration, TimeUnit.MINUTES).build(new CacheLoader<String, XPathAPI>() {
                    @Override
                    public XPathAPI load(final String key) {
                        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {

		if doCR {
			buf.WriteByte('\r')
		}
		buf.WriteByte('\n')
	}
}

// Test the line splitter, including some carriage returns but no long lines.
func TestScanLongLines(t *testing.T) {
	// Build a buffer of lots of line lengths up to but not exceeding smallMaxTokenSize.
	tmp := new(bytes.Buffer)
	buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
	lineNum := 0
	j := 0
	for i := 0; i < 2*smallMaxTokenSize; i++ {

    }

    open fun build(): Response {
      check(code >= 0) { "code < 0: $code" }
      return Response(
        checkNotNull(request) { "request == null" },
        checkNotNull(protocol) { "protocol == null" },
        checkNotNull(message) { "message == null" },
        code,
        handshake,
        headers.build(),
        body,
        networkResponse,

            ImmutableList.<Class<?>>builder()
                .add(predicateType)
                .add(String.class) // the format string
                .addAll(curr)
                .build());
      }
    }
    return allOverloads.build().asList();
  }

  // 'test' to demonstrate some potentially ambiguous overloads.  This 'test' is kind of strange,

 * create an instance of one of the built-in implementations of {@code Graph}, use the {@link
 * GraphBuilder} class:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph = GraphBuilder.undirected().build();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>{@link GraphBuilder#build()} returns an instance of {@link MutableGraph}, which is a subtype

 * create an instance of one of the built-in implementations of {@code Graph}, use the {@link
 * GraphBuilder} class:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph = GraphBuilder.undirected().build();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>{@link GraphBuilder#build()} returns an instance of {@link MutableGraph}, which is a subtype

    private static final ThreadFactory threadFactory =
        new ThreadFactoryBuilder()
            .setDaemon(true)
            .setNameFormat("ListenableFutureAdapter-thread-%d")
            .build();
    private static final Executor defaultAdapterExecutor =
        Executors.newCachedThreadPool(threadFactory);

    private final Executor adapterExecutor;

    // The execution list to hold our listeners.