* be {@code a -> c}.
     * <p>
     * Original code would falsely report {@code a} project as "without dependencies", basically would lose link due
     * filtering. This causes build ordering issues in concurrent builders.
     */
    private List<MavenProject> applyFilter(
            Collection<? extends MavenProject> projects, boolean transitive, boolean upstream) {

      .cache(Cache(
          directory = File(application.cacheDir, "http_cache"),
          // $0.05 worth of phone storage in 2020
          maxSize = 50L * 1024L * 1024L // 50 MiB
      ))
      .build()
```

## EventListener events 

Cache Events are exposed via the EventListener API.  Typical scenarios are below.

### Cache Hit

          .put("SHA-1", Hashing.sha1())
          .put("SHA-256", Hashing.sha256())
          .put("SHA-384", Hashing.sha384())
          .put("SHA-512", Hashing.sha512())
          .build();

  public void testHashing() {
    for (String stringToTest : INPUTS) {
      for (String algorithmToTest : ALGORITHMS.keySet()) {
        assertMessageDigestHashing(HashTestUtils.ascii(stringToTest), algorithmToTest);

    ImmutableMultiset.Builder<T> builder = ImmutableMultiset.builder();
    for (Entry<T, Integer> entry : counts.entrySet()) {
      builder.addCopies(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
    }
    return builder.build();
  }

  private ListenerCallQueue.Event<Object> countDownEvent(final CountDownLatch latch) {
    return new ListenerCallQueue.Event<Object>() {
      @Override
      public void call(Object listener) {

    ImmutableMultiset.Builder<T> builder = ImmutableMultiset.builder();
    for (Entry<T, Integer> entry : counts.entrySet()) {
      builder.addCopies(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
    }
    return builder.build();
  }

  private ListenerCallQueue.Event<Object> countDownEvent(final CountDownLatch latch) {
    return new ListenerCallQueue.Event<Object>() {
      @Override
      public void call(Object listener) {

        assertEquals(incremental, artifactVersion.getIncrementalVersion(), parsed + "check incremental version");
        assertEquals(buildnumber, artifactVersion.getBuildNumber(), parsed + "check build number");
        assertEquals(qualifier, artifactVersion.getQualifier(), parsed + "check qualifier");
        assertEquals(version, artifactVersion.toString(), "check " + version + " string value");
    }

    @Test

	}
	return p.errorCount == 0
}

// nextToken returns the next non-build-comment token from the lexer.
// It reports misplaced //go:build comments but otherwise discards them.
func (p *Parser) nextToken() lex.ScanToken {
	for {
		tok := p.lex.Next()
		if tok == lex.BuildComment {
			if p.sawCode {
				p.errorf("misplaced //go:build comment")
			}
			continue
		}
		if tok != '\n' {
			p.sawCode = true

					if rel.Field.IgnoreMigration {
						continue
					}
					if constraint := rel.ParseConstraint(); constraint != nil {
						if constraint.Schema == stmt.Schema {
							sql, vars := constraint.Build()
							createTableSQL += sql + ","
							values = append(values, vars...)
						}
					}
				}
			}

			for _, uni := range stmt.Schema.ParseUniqueConstraints() {

<a href="https://platform.sh/try-it-now/?utm_source=fastapi-signup&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=FastAPI-signup-June-2023" target="_blank" title="Build, run and scale your apps on a modern, reliable, and secure PaaS."><img src="https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/platform-sh.png"></a>

     * will throw an exception if there are duplicate keys. The {@code build()} method will soon be
     * deprecated.
     *
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any two keys are equal according to the comparator (which
     *     might be the keys' natural order)
     */
    @Override
    public ImmutableSortedMap<K, V> build() {
      return buildOrThrow();
    }

    /**