@AndroidIncompatible // depends on details of GC
  public void testFreesNextReference() {
    Iterator<Object> itr =
        new AbstractIterator<Object>() {
          @Override
          public Object computeNext() {
            return new Object();
          }
        };
    WeakReference<Object> ref = new WeakReference<>(itr.next());
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(ref);
  }

    assertEquals(1, Iterators.size(registry.getSubscribers(new Object())));
    assertEquals(1, Iterators.size(registry.getSubscribers(1)));

    registry.register(new IntegerSubscriber());
    assertEquals(3, Iterators.size(registry.getSubscribers("")));
    assertEquals(1, Iterators.size(registry.getSubscribers(new Object())));
    assertEquals(2, Iterators.size(registry.getSubscribers(1)));
  }

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

	Timeout time.Duration

	// InsecureSkipVerify skips client verification the server's certificate chain and host name.
	InsecureSkipVerify bool

	// XDSSAN is the expected Subject Alternative Name of the XDS server
	XDSSAN string

	// Plaintext forces plain text communication (for talking to port 15010)
	Plaintext bool

	// GCP project number or ID to use for XDS calls, if any.

                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "x": {"title": "X", "type": "number"},
                        "y": {"title": "Y", "type": "number"},
                    },
                },
                "HTTPValidationError": {
                    "title": "HTTPValidationError",
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {

| ----------|-------------|----------------------------------------
| xlHeader  | [4]byte     | `'X', 'L', '2', ' '`
| xlVersion | [4]byte     | `'1', ' ', ' ', ' '`
| xlMetaV2  | msgp object | All versions as single messagepack object
| [EOF] | |

### v1.1+

Version 1.1 added inline data, which will be placed after the metadata.

Therefore, the metadata is wrapped as a binary array for easy skipping.

			Yaml:   true,
			Pretty: true,
			Strict: true,
		})

	whObject, _, err := deserializer.Decode([]byte(validatingWebhookYAML), nil, &admitv1.ValidatingWebhookConfiguration{})
	if err != nil {
		return "", fmt.Errorf("could not decode generated webhook: %w", err)
	}
	decodedWh := whObject.(*admitv1.ValidatingWebhookConfiguration)
	for i := range decodedWh.Webhooks {

against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server. MinIO's...

    }

    @Override
    public void acceptAllColumnMap(Entity entity, Map<String, ? extends Object> allColumnMap) {
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractPrimaryKeyMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractAllColumnMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;