* <p>Memory consistency effects: Actions in a thread prior to adding a listener <a
   * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-17.html#jls-17.4.5">
   * <i>happen-before</i></a> its execution begins, perhaps in another thread.
   *
   * <p>Guava implementations of {@code ListenableFuture} promptly release references to listeners
   * after executing them.
   *
   * @param listener the listener to run when the computation is complete

        /*
         * lowasser, 2015-Feb-12: Benchmarks suggest that changing this to UnsignedLongs.remainder
         * and increasing the threshold to 2^32 doesn't pay for itself, and adding another enum
         * constant hurts performance further -- I suspect because bimorphic implementation is a
         * sweet spot for the JVM.
         */
        return (a * b) % m;
      }

      @Override

            byte[] buffer = new byte[] { 0x02, 0x00, // 2 hash algos
                    0x04, 0x00, // 4 bytes salt
                    0x01, 0x00, // SHA512
                    0x02, 0x00, // Another hash algo
                    0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D // Salt
            };

            // Act
            int decodedSize = context.decode(buffer, 0, buffer.length);

            // Assert

        end
        handler -->> client: HTTP error response
    end

    operation ->> client: Return response to client
    Note over client,operation: Response is already sent, can't change it anymore
    opt Tasks
        operation -->> tasks: Send background tasks
    end
    opt Raise other exception

       * doesn't need access to the futures again, so we can just pass `null`.
       *
       * TODO(b/112550045): Allocating a single, cheaper listener is (I think) only an optimization.
       * If we make some other optimizations, this one will no longer be necessary. The optimization
       * could actually hurt in some cases, as it forces us to keep all inputs in memory until the
       * final input completes.
       */

     * <p>
     * <strong>Purpose:</strong> This method provides the base output directory for a given scope,
     * which serves as the destination for compiled classes, processed resources, and other generated files.
     * The returned path is always absolute.
     * </p>
     * <p>
     * <strong>Scope-based Directory Resolution:</strong>
     * </p>
     * <table class="striped">

				errs[idx] = err
			}
		}(idx, pool)
	}
	wg.Wait()
	for _, err := range errs {
		return err
	}
	return nil
}

// DecomTieredObject - moves tiered object to another pool during decommissioning.
func (z *erasureServerPools) DecomTieredObject(ctx context.Context, bucket, object string, fi FileInfo, opts ObjectOptions) error {
	object = encodeDirObject(object)
	if z.SinglePool() {

Aber in der Praxis werden Sie mit den integrierten [Sicherheits-Werkzeugen](security/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank} bessere Ergebnisse erzielen.

///

## Ein weiteres Modul mit `APIRouter` { #another-module-with-apirouter }

Nehmen wir an, Sie haben im Modul unter `app/routers/items.py` auch die Endpunkte, die für die Verarbeitung von Artikeln („Items“) aus Ihrer Anwendung vorgesehen sind.

В реальных случаях для получения наилучших результатов используйте интегрированные [утилиты безопасности](security/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

///

## Ещё один модуль с `APIRouter` { #another-module-with-apirouter }

Давайте также предположим, что у вас есть *эндпоинты*, отвечающие за обработку "items", и они находятся в модуле `app/routers/items.py`.

У вас определены следующие *операции пути* (*эндпоинты*):

    /**
     * Deletes a dictionary item.
     *
     * @param item the item to delete
     */
    public abstract void delete(T item);

    /**
     * A paginated list implementation that wraps another list and provides
     * pagination metadata and functionality.
     *
     * @param <E> the type of elements in this list
     */
    public static class PagingList<E> implements List<E> {