newtierfi.TransitionedObjName = ""
	newtierfi.TransitionStatus = ""
	newtierfi.SetTierFreeVersionID(fvIDs[1])
	report()
	_, err = xl.DeleteVersion(newtierfi)
	report()
	fatalErr(err)

	// At this point the version stack must look as below,
	// v3 --> free version      00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000f2 (from removal of null version)
	// v2 --> free version      00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000f1 (from overwriting of null version )

        // Proximity (2 bytes for v3)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, 16);

        // Time to live (2 bytes for v3)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(300, buffer, 18);

        // DFS path offset (2 bytes) - points to string data
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(stringDataStart - 8, buffer, 20); // Offset from start of referral

        // DFS alternate path offset (2 bytes)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, 22);

* **Asynchronous Code**
* **`async` and `await`**
* **Coroutines**

## Asynchronous Code { #asynchronous-code }

Asynchronous code just means that the language 💬 has a way to tell the computer / program 🤖 that at some point in the code, it 🤖 will have to wait for *something else* to finish somewhere else. Let's say that *something else* is called "slow-file" 📝.

     * (if applicable). This process will essentially remove duplicate repositories by merging them into one equivalent
     * repository. It is worth to point out that merging does not simply choose one of the input repositories and
     * discards the others but actually combines their possibly different policies.
     *

#### The time to answer helps the attackers { #the-time-to-answer-helps-the-attackers }

At that point, by noticing that the server took some microseconds longer to send the "Incorrect username or password" response, the attackers will know that they got _something_ right, some of the initial letters were right.

          shift += 24;
          len += 3;
        } else {
          int codePoint = Character.codePointAt(input, i);
          if (codePoint == c) {
            // not a valid code point; let the JDK handle invalid Unicode
            return hashBytes(input.toString().getBytes(charset));
          }
          i++;
          buffer |= codePointToFourUtf8Bytes(codePoint) << shift;

    public static final String PATH = "crawler.dfmail";

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                         Entry Point
    //                                                                         ===========
    public static CrawlerPostcard droppedInto(Postbox postbox, MPCall<CrawlerPostcard> postcardLambda) {

    assertEquals(null, navigableSet.higher(c));
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): make "too small" and "too large" elements available for better navigation
   * testing. At that point, we may be able to eliminate the "hole" tests, which would mean that
   * ContiguousSet's tests would no longer need to suppress them.
   */
  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  public void testLower() {

    // let the computation proceed
    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

    // At this point, the listener should be holding the seed value (a -> a), and the map should
    // contain the computed value (b -> b), since the clear() happened before the computation
    // completed.
    assertEquals(1, listener.size());

    // let the computation proceed
    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

    // At this point, the listener should be holding the seed value (a -> a), and the map should
    // contain the computed value (b -> b), since the clear() happened before the computation
    // completed.
    assertEquals(1, listener.size());