}

  @Override
  public <T> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
    return delegate.toArray(a);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  private <T> T checkValid(T t) {
    // a ClassCastException is what's supposed to happen!
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    E e = (E) t;
    int unused = comparator().compare(e, e);
    return t;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {

// under the procfs, /proc/<pid>/ns/net. In majority of cases, this is not used directly, but is rather bind mounted to
// /var/run/netns/<name>. However, this pattern is not ubiquitous. Some platforms bind mount to other places. As we run
// in a pod, we cannot just access any arbitrary file they happen to bind mount in, as we don't know ahead of time where
// it might be.
//
// Instead, we rely directly on the procfs.
// This rules out two possible methods:

			return nil, fmt.Errorf("aborted")
		}
	}
	if err != nil {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get pod %s/%s: %v", namespace, name, err)
	}

	// This shouldn't happen - we only trigger this when a pod is added to ambient.
	if ambientPod == nil {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("pod %s/%s is unexpectedly not enrolled in ambient", namespace, name)
	}
	return ambientPod, nil

 *       classpath scanning and make the results available to an Android app</a>.)
 *   <li>Like all of Guava, it is not tested under Windows. We have gotten <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2130">a report of a specific bug under
 *       Windows</a>.
 *   <li>It <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2712">returns only one resource for a

	DB.Save(&user1).Save(&user2).Save(&user3)

	rows, err := DB.Table("users").Where("name = ? or name = ?", user2.Name, user3.Name).Select("name, age").Rows()
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("No error should happen, got %v", err)
	}

	type Result struct {
		Name string
		Age  int
	}

	var results []Result
	for rows.Next() {
		var result Result
		if err := DB.ScanRows(rows, &result); err != nil {

	compress := env.Get(EnvCompressState, kvs.Get(config.Enable))
	if compress == "" {
		compress = env.Get(EnvCompress, "")
	}
	cfg.Enabled, err = config.ParseBool(compress)
	if err != nil {
		// Parsing failures happen due to empty KVS, ignore it.
		if kvs.Empty() {
			return cfg, nil
		}
		return cfg, err
	}
	if !cfg.Enabled {
		return cfg, nil
	}

		timeout := atomic.LoadInt64(&dt.timeout) * 125 / 100

		// Set upper cap.
		if timeout > int64(maxDynamicTimeout) {
			timeout = int64(maxDynamicTimeout)
		}
		// Safety, shouldn't happen
		if timeout < dt.minimum {
			timeout = dt.minimum
		}
		atomic.StoreInt64(&dt.timeout, timeout)
	} else if failPct < dynamicTimeoutDecreaseThresholdPct {
		// We are hitting the timeout relatively few times,

	errInvalidSubstringIndexLen = errors.New("Substring start index or length falls outside the string")
)

const (
	percent    rune = '%'
	underscore rune = '_'
	runeZero   rune = 0
)

func evalSQLLike(text, pattern string, escape rune) (match bool, err error) {
	s := []rune{}
	prev := runeZero
	hasLeadingPercent := false
	patLen := len([]rune(pattern))

 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even

			}

			if totalGet < throughputHighestGet {
				// Following check is for situations
				// when Writes() scale higher than Reads()
				// - practically speaking this never happens
				// and should never happen - however it has
				// been seen recently due to hardware issues
				// causes Reads() to go slower than Writes().
				//
				// Send such results anyways as this shall
				// expose a problem underneath.