* {@code directExecutor} functions should avoid heavyweight operations inside {@code
   * AsyncFunction.apply}. Any heavyweight operations should occur in other threads responsible for
   * completing the returned {@code Future}.)
   *
   * <p>This method is similar to {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture#exceptionally}. It

  }

  public void testNegativeTimeout() throws Exception {
    future.set(1);
    assertEquals(1, future.get(-1, SECONDS).intValue());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);

 * evicted or manually invalidated. The common way to build instances is using {@link CacheBuilder}.
 *
 * <p>Implementations of this interface are expected to be thread-safe, and can be safely accessed
 * by multiple concurrent threads.
 *
 * @param <K> the type of the cache's keys, which are not permitted to be null
 * @param <V> the type of the cache's values, which are not permitted to be null
 * @author Charles Fry

        if (totalHits > unprocessedDocumentSize && intervalControlHelper.isCrawlerRunning()) {
            if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
                logger.info("Stopped all crawler threads. You have {} (>{}) unprocessed docs.", totalHits, unprocessedDocumentSize);
            }
            intervalControlHelper.setCrawlerRunning(false);
        }
        return arList;
    }

  /**
   * Cached value of #publicSuffixIndex(). Do not use directly.
   *
   * <p>Since this field isn't {@code volatile}, if an instance of this class is shared across
   * threads before it is initialized, then each thread is likely to compute their own copy of the
   * value.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("Immutable")
  @LazyInit
  private int publicSuffixIndexCache = SUFFIX_NOT_INITIALIZED;

  /**

Si vous avez de bonnes connaissances techniques (coroutines, threads, code bloquant, etc.) et êtes curieux de comment **FastAPI** gère `async def` versus le `def` classique, cette partie est faite pour vous.

///

### Fonctions de chemin

     * until we send the frame that acknowledges this new size.
     *
     * Since we can't ACK settings on the current reader thread (the reader thread can't write) we
     * execute all peer settings logic on the writer thread. This relies on the fact that the
     * writer task queue won't reorder tasks; otherwise settings could be applied in the opposite
     * order than received.
     */

But before that, handling asynchronous code was quite more complex and difficult.

In previous versions of Python, you could have used threads or <a href="https://www.gevent.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Gevent</a>. But the code is way more complex to understand, debug, and think about.

   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache

    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using
    // java/lang/management/OperatingSystemMXBean.html#getSystemLoadAverage()
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider scaling by number of mutator threads,
    // e.g. using Thread#activeCount()
    return max(10L, Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory() / (32L * 1024L * 1024L));
  }

  /**