* "should" be nestmates, so a call to MethodHandles.lookup or
   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater.newUpdater inside *AtomicHelper "should" have access to
   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files

 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many
 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},
 * one can get a better result, as only a few registry suffixes are addressable. However, the most

                 * so. We cannot just comment out this method and use readString of
                 * ServerMessageBlock.java because the arguments are different, however
                 * one might be able to reduce this.
                 */

                if (len > 0 && src[srcIndex + len - 1] == '\0') {
                    len--;
                }

   * generalized escaping for characters.
   *
   * <p>Note that arrays returned by this method must not be modified once they have been returned.
   * However it is acceptable to return the same array multiple times (even for different input
   * characters).
   *
   * @param c the character to escape

   *
   * <p>The behavior of {@link #get(Comparable) get(k)} after calling this method is identical to
   * the behavior described in {@link #put(Range, Object) put(range, value)}, however the ranges
   * returned from {@link #asMapOfRanges} will be different if there were existing entries which
   * connect to the given range and value.
   *

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

 * in this context(e.g. you cannot <code>delete</code> a server) however
 * as you might expect the <code>list</code> method will list the available
 * shares on this server.
 * </td></tr>
 *
 * <tr><td ><code>smb1://myworkgroup/</code></td><td>
 * This syntactically is identical to the above example. However if
 * <code>myworkgroup</code> happends to be a workgroup(which is indeed