* safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code list} is a {@code List<String>}, then {@code ImmutableList.copyOf(list)}
   * returns an {@code ImmutableList<String>} containing each of the strings in {@code list}, while
   * {@code ImmutableList.of(list)} returns an {@code ImmutableList<List<String>>} containing one

      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)
        .compound(BY_PARAMETERS)
        .immutableSortedCopy(factories);
  }

    assertWithMessage("Mixed hex case").that((int) Ints.tryParse("ffFF", 16)).isEqualTo(65535);
  }

  /**
   * Encodes an integer as a string with given radix, then uses {@link Ints#tryParse(String, int)}
   * to parse the result. Asserts the result is the same as what we started with.
   */
  private static void radixEncodeParseAndAssertEquals(Integer value, int radix) {

		}
	}

	// Bucket federation is 'true' only when IAM assets are not namespaced
	// per tenant and all tenants interested in globally available users
	// if namespace was requested such as specifying etcdPathPrefix then
	// we assume that users are interested in global bucket support
	// but not federation.
	globalBucketFederation = etcdCfg.PathPrefix == "" && etcdCfg.Enabled

    thread.join();
    // It's possible to race and suspend the thread just before the park call actually takes effect,
    // causing the thread to be suspended for 3.5 seconds, and then park itself for 2 seconds after
    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually
    // waited and assert based on that time. Empirically, the race where the thread ends up waiting

        }
        return availableSearchers;
    }

    /**
     * Performs concurrent searches using multiple searchers and fuses the results.
     * Executes searches in parallel across all provided searchers, then combines the results
     * using rank fusion algorithms to produce a unified result set.
     *
     * @param searchers array of searchers to use for concurrent searching
     * @param query the search query string

    // the monitor with the guard satisfied. Therefore as soon as tearDownLatch is triggered, we
    // should be able to enter the monitor, and then we set the guard to satisfied for the benefit
    // of any remaining waiting threads.

    tearDownLatch.countDown();
    assertTrue(
        "Monitor still occupied in tearDown()",

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;

/**
 * Tests for {@link Graphs}. Tests assume that the implementation of the method {@code addEdge} adds
 * the missing nodes to the graph, then adds the edge between them.
 */
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
@NullUnmarked
public class GraphsTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;
  private static final Integer N2 = 2;
  private static final Integer N3 = 3;

 *       <i>deeply</i> immutable.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Performance notes</h4>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is

   * previously configured separator between each.
   */
  public String join(Iterable<?> parts) {
    /*
     * If we can quickly determine how many elements there are likely to be, then we can use the
     * fastest possible implementation, which delegates to the array overload of String.join.
     *
     * In theory, we can quickly determine the size of any Collection. However, thanks to