512,
            513,
            Double.MAX_EXPONENT - 1,
            Double.MAX_EXPONENT,
            Double.MAX_EXPONENT + 1)) {
      BigInteger x = ONE.shiftLeft(exponent);
      bigValues.add(x, x.add(ONE), x.subtract(ONE));
    }
    bigValues.add(new BigInteger("218838949120258359057546633")); // sqrt(2^175) rounded up and
    // down
    bigValues.add(new BigInteger("218838949120258359057546634"));

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>use {@link StringReader} instead of {@link CharSequenceReader}. It is faster since it can
   *       use {@link String#getChars(int, int, char[], int)} instead of copying characters one by
   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *   <li>use {@link Appendable#append(CharSequence)} in {@link #copyTo(Appendable)} and {@link

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>use {@link StringReader} instead of {@link CharSequenceReader}. It is faster since it can
   *       use {@link String#getChars(int, int, char[], int)} instead of copying characters one by
   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *   <li>use {@link Appendable#append(CharSequence)} in {@link #copyTo(Appendable)} and {@link

            // to). Our contract promises:
            //
            // 1. not to execute a new callable until the old one has returned
            //
            // If we were to cancel taskFuture, that would let the next task start while the old
            // one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the

   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *
   * <p>tl4j details: For backwards compatibility, {@code junit3.TearDownTestCase} currently does
   * not fail a test when an exception is thrown from one of its {@link TearDown} instances, but
   * this is subject to change. Also, {@code junit4.TearDownTestCase} will.
   *
   * @throws Exception for any reason. {@code TearDownTestCase} ensures that any exception thrown

    /**
     * @throws Exception
     */
    @Test
    public void testContains() throws Exception {
        final Set<String> set = new CaseInsensitiveSet();
        set.add("one");
        assertThat(set.contains("ONE"), is(true));
    }

    extends AbstractImmutableMapMapInterfaceTest<String, Integer> {
  @Override
  protected Map<String, Integer> makePopulatedMap() {
    return ImmutableMap.of("one", 1);
  }

  @Override
  protected String getKeyNotInPopulatedMap() {
    return "minus one";
  }

  @Override
  protected Integer getValueNotInPopulatedMap() {
    return -1;
  }

environment.title = Production

# Does it enable the Framework internal debug? (true only when emergency)
framework.debug = false

# one day: 86400000, three days: 259200000, five days: 432000000, one week: 604800000, one year: 31556926000
# special script :: absolute mode: $(2014/07/10), relative mode: addDay(3).addMonth(4)

    return ImmutableSortedMap.of();
  }

  @Override
  protected SortedMap<String, Integer> makePopulatedMap() {
    return ImmutableSortedMap.of("one", 1, "two", 2, "three", 3);
  }

  @Override
  protected String getKeyNotInPopulatedMap() {
    return "minus one";
  }

  @Override
  protected Integer getValueNotInPopulatedMap() {
    return -1;
  }

 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},
 * one can get a better result, as only a few registry suffixes are addressable. However, the most