Using this same trick, you could use a Pydantic model to define the JSON Schema that is then included in the custom OpenAPI schema section for the *path operation*.

And you could do this even if the data type in the request is not JSON.

    "functionalTests": true,
    "crossVersionTests": false
  },
  {
    "name": "model-core",
    "path": "platforms/core-configuration/model-core",
    "unitTests": true,
    "functionalTests": true,
    "crossVersionTests": false
  },
  {
    "name": "model-groovy",
    "path": "platforms/core-configuration/model-groovy",
    "unitTests": true,
    "functionalTests": true,
    "crossVersionTests": false

            @Override
            public Model getRawModel(Path from, String gId, String aId) {
                Model model = findRawModel(from, gId, aId);
                if (model != null) {
                    context.modelByGA.put(new GAKey(gId, aId), new Holder(model));
                    context.modelByPath.put(model.getPomPath(), new Holder(model));
                }
                return model;
            }

            @Override

* Modelo de documentação automática com <a href="https://json-schema.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>JSON Schema</strong></a> (já que o OpenAPI em si é baseado no JSON Schema).

-->

<project>
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <artifactId>aid</artifactId>
  <groupId>gid</groupId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>pom</packaging>

  <modules>
    <module>child</module>
    <module>child</module>
  </modules>

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.model.plugin;

import org.apache.maven.model.Model;
import org.apache.maven.model.building.ModelBuildingRequest;
import org.apache.maven.model.building.ModelProblemCollector;

/**
 * Handles conversion of the <code>&lt;reporting&gt;</code> section into the configuration of Maven Site Plugin 3.x,

/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * a distinct value is taken from each parent contributing to
 * the final model of the project being assembled. There is no
 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values

    disabled = user_dict["disabled"],
    hashed_password = user_dict["hashed_password"],
)
```

/// info

For a more complete explanation of `**user_dict` check back in [the documentation for **Extra Models**](../extra-models.md#about-user_indict){.internal-link target=_blank}.

///

## Return the token

The response of the `token` endpoint must be a JSON object.

Tatsächlich gibt es in einigen Fällen sogar **zwei JSON-Schemas** in OpenAPI für dasselbe Pydantic-Modell für Eingabe und Ausgabe, je nachdem, ob sie **Defaultwerte** haben.

Sehen wir uns an, wie das funktioniert und wie Sie es bei Bedarf ändern können.

## Pydantic-Modelle für Eingabe und Ausgabe

Nehmen wir an, Sie haben ein Pydantic-Modell mit Defaultwerten wie dieses:

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python hl_lines="7"

Suponha que você tem um único parâmetro de corpo `item`, a partir de um modelo Pydantic `Item`.

Por padrão, o **FastAPI** esperará que seu conteúdo venha no corpo diretamente.

Mas se você quiser que ele espere por um JSON com uma chave `item` e dentro dele os conteúdos do modelo, como ocorre ao declarar vários parâmetros de corpo, você pode usar o parâmetro especial de `Body` chamado `embed`: