assertTrue(
                    description.toLowerCase().contains("compatibility")
                            || description.toLowerCase().contains("fix"),
                    "Description should mention compatibility or fix");
        }
    }

/// check | vérifier

Donc, avec ces mêmes déclarations de type Python, **FastAPI** vous fournit de la validation de données.

Notez que l'erreur mentionne le point exact où la validation n'a pas réussi.

Ce qui est incroyablement utile au moment de développer et débugger du code qui interagit avec votre API.

///

## Documentation

 RollingUpdate for the apps/v1beta2 group version. You can explicitly set
 the OnDelete strategy, and no strategy auto-conversion is applied to
 replace default values.

 - As mentioned in [Behavioral Changes](#behavioral-changes), selector
 defaults are disabled.

 - The default spec.revisionHistoryLimit for all applicable kinds in the
 apps/v1beta2 group version is 10.

            // It could be either "Unexpected number of update indices" or "Unexpected number of search indices"
            // depending on which check fails first
            assertTrue("Exception message should mention unexpected indices: " + exceptionMessage,
                    exceptionMessage.contains("Unexpected number of update indices")
                            || exceptionMessage.contains("Unexpected number of search indices"));

- Fixed in-tree to CSI migration for Portworx volumes, in clusters where Portworx security feature is enabled (it's a Portworx feature, not Kubernetes feature). It required secret data from the secret mentioned in-tree SC, to be passed in CSI requests which was not happening before this fix. ([#129675](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129675), [@gohilankit](https://github.com/gohilankit)) [SIG Storage]

	t = t.UTC() // Convert to UTC for compatibility
	h.Modified = t
	h.ModifiedDate, h.ModifiedTime = timeToMsDosTime(t)
}

const (
	// Unix constants. The specification doesn't mention them,
	// but these seem to be the values agreed on by tools.
	s_IFMT   = 0xf000
	s_IFSOCK = 0xc000
	s_IFLNK  = 0xa000
	s_IFREG  = 0x8000
	s_IFBLK  = 0x6000
	s_IFDIR  = 0x4000
	s_IFCHR  = 0x2000

         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while

            assertTrue(
                    description.toLowerCase().contains("model")
                            || description.toLowerCase().contains("upgrade"),
                    "Description should mention model or upgrade");
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Phase Upgrades")
    class PhaseUpgradeTests {

        @Test

         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while

		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrInvalidCopySource: {
		Code:           "InvalidArgument",
		Description:    "Copy Source must mention the source bucket and key: sourcebucket/sourcekey.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrInvalidMetadataDirective: {
		Code:           "InvalidArgument",
		Description:    "Unknown metadata directive.",