for (Striped<?> striped : allImplementations()) {
      new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicInstanceMethods(striped);
    }
  }

  public void testSizes() {
    // not bothering testing all variations, since we know they share implementations
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(100).size() >= 100);
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(256).size() == 256);
    assertTrue(Striped.lazyWeakLock(100).size() >= 100);

                        try {
                            buf.append(URLEncoder.encode(String.valueOf(c), Constants.UTF_8));
                        } catch (final UnsupportedEncodingException e) {
                            // NOP
                        }
                    }
                }
                hash = buf.toString();
            } else {
                hash = StringUtil.EMPTY;
            }
        } else {

    assertSize(0);
    table = create("foo", 1, 'a', "bar", 1, 'b', "foo", 3, 'c');
    assertSize(3);
  }

  public void testEquals() {
    table = create("foo", 1, 'a', "bar", 1, 'b', "foo", 3, 'c');
    // We know that we have only added non-null Characters.
    Table<String, Integer, Character> hashCopy =
        HashBasedTable.create((Table<String, Integer, ? extends Character>) table);

                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,

                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,

  }

  public void testBuilder_presize_negative() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableIntArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

  }

  public void testBuilder_presize_negative() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

        // Here's the tricky bit. We don't have to explicitly check for condition2 in this case.
        // Why? The second half of condition2 requires that nodeV equals other.nodeU.
        // We already know that nodeU equals other.nodeU. Combined with the earlier statement,
        // and the transitive property of equality, this implies that nodeU equals nodeV.

    assertSize(0);
    table = create("foo", 1, 'a', "bar", 1, 'b', "foo", 3, 'c');
    assertSize(3);
  }

  public void testEquals() {
    table = create("foo", 1, 'a', "bar", 1, 'b', "foo", 3, 'c');
    // We know that we have only added non-null Characters.
    Table<String, Integer, Character> hashCopy =
        HashBasedTable.create((Table<String, Integer, ? extends Character>) table);

what is explained in that document, and
describes the peculiarities that apply when writing assembly code to interact with Go.
</p>

<p>
The most important thing to know about Go's assembler is that it is not a direct representation of the underlying machine.
Some of the details map precisely to the machine, but some do not.
This is because the compiler suite (see