using `AffinityInAnnotations=true` in `--feature-gates`, then the 1.7 release is your last opportunity to convert from specifying affinity/anti-affinity using the scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/affinity annotation on Pods, to using the Affinity field of PodSpec. Support for the alpha version of node and pod affinity (which uses the scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/affinity annotations on Pods) is going away **in Kubernetes 1.8** (not this release, but the next release). If you have not enabled Affini...

- **Stateful Application Support**
  - Enhanced persistence capabilities (eg: `StorageClasses`, new volume plugins)
  - New resources and scheduler features (eg: `ScheduledJob` resource, pod/node affinity/anti-affinity)
- **Cluster Federation**
  - Global Multi-cluster HTTP(S) Ingress across GCE and GKE clusters.
  - Expanded support for federated hybrid-cloud resources including ReplicaSets, Secrets, Namespaces and Events.

this.state);\n  }\n}\n","/**\n * Tells if a given input is a number\n * @method\n * @memberof Popper.Utils\n * @param {*} input to check\n * @return {Boolean}\n */\nexport default function isNumeric(n) {\n  return n !== '' && !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);\n}\n","import isNumeric from './isNumeric';\n\n/**\n * Set the style to the given popper\n * @method\n * @memberof Popper.Utils\n * @argument {Element} element - Element to apply the style to\n * @argument {Object} styles\n * Object with a list...

- Changed the error message displayed when a pod is trying to attach a volume that does not match the label/selector from "x node(s) had volume node affinity conflict" to "x node(s) didn't match PersistentVolume's node affinity". ([#129887](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129887), [@rhrmo](https://github.com/rhrmo)) [SIG Scheduling and Storage]

    assertThat(response3.body.string()).isEqualTo("def")
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(1) // New connection.
  }

  /**
   * We had a bug where we'd perform infinite retries of route that fail with connection shutdown
   * errors. The problem was that the logic that decided whether to reuse a route didn't track
   * certain HTTP/2 errors. https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/5547
   */

- Fixed 'kubeadm upgrade' infinite loop waiting for pod restart ([#69886](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/69886), [@bart0sh](https://github.com/bart0sh))

    filesystem.deleteRecursively(cacheDir)
    assertThat(cache["a"]).isNull()
  }

  /**
   * We had a long-lived bug where [DiskLruCache.trimToSize] could infinite loop if entries
   * being edited required deletion for the operation to complete.
   */
  @ParameterizedTest
  @ArgumentsSource(FileSystemParamProvider::class)

{min-height:1.2em}.placeholder-glow .placeholder{animation:placeholder-glow 2s ease-in-out infinite}@keyframes placeholder-glow{50%{opacity:.2}}.placeholder-wave{-webkit-mask-image:linear-gradient(130deg,#000 55%,rgba(0,0,0,0.8) 75%,#000 95%);mask-image:linear-gradient(130deg,#000 55%,rgba(0,0,0,0.8) 75%,#000 95%);-webkit-mask-size:200% 100%;mask-size:200% 100%;animation:placeholder-wave 2s linear infinite}@keyframes placeholder-wave{100%{-webkit-mask-position:-200% 0%;mask-position:-200% 0%}}.c...

- The calculations for Pod topology spread skew now exclude nodes that
  don't match the node affinity/selector. This may lead to unschedulable pods if you previously had pods
  matching the spreading selector on those excluded nodes (not matching the node affinity/selector),
  especially when the `topologyKey` is not node-level. Revisit the node affinity and/or pod selector in the

}

// DeletePolicy - deletes a canned policy from backend. `notifyPeers` is true
// whenever this is called via the API. It is false when called via a
// notification from another peer. This is to avoid infinite loops.
func (sys *IAMSys) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, policyName string, notifyPeers bool) error {
	if !sys.Initialized() {
		return errServerNotInitialized
	}

	for _, v := range policy.DefaultPolicies {