/**
     * Deletes a crawling information record and all its associated parameters.
     * First deletes all related CrawlingInfoParam records, then deletes the main record
     * with immediate refresh to ensure consistency.
     *
     * @param crawlingInfo the crawling information entity to delete
     */
    public void delete(final CrawlingInfo crawlingInfo) {
        setupDeleteCondition(crawlingInfo);

    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */
    // blech! this isn't even intelligible as a method name. provided for
    // consistency...
    public boolean isOnlineRequired() {
        return onlineRequired;
    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */

   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code
   *       comparator.compare(tj, ti) > 0} for {@code i < j}, where {@code ti =
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder.get(i)} and {@code tj = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j)}.

   * common prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter array as the
   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */

        }
        checkArgument(
            fromParameterizedType.getRawType().equals(toParameterizedType.getRawType()),
            "Inconsistent raw type: %s vs. %s",
            fromParameterizedType,
            to);
        Type[] fromArgs = fromParameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments();
        Type[] toArgs = toParameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments();

   * common prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter array as the
   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */

        assertEquals(longId.toString(), rule.getRuleId());

        ResponseData responseData = new ResponseData();
        assertTrue(rule.match(responseData));
    }

    /**
     * Test rule behavior consistency
     */
    public void test_ruleBehaviorConsistency() {
        TestRule rule = new TestRule("consistentRule", new TestResponseProcessor("consistentProcessor"), true);

        assertEquals(0x20, nbtAddress.getNameType());
    }

    @Test
    void testHashCode() {
        // Test hashCode consistency
        mockName = new Name(mockConfig, "TEST1", 0x20, null);
        Name mockName2 = new Name(mockConfig, "TEST2", 0x20, null);

      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return getKey() + "=" + getValue();
    }
  }

  // TODO(fry): Separate logic for consistency between emul and nonemul implementation.
  // TODO(fry): Look into Maps.KeySet and Maps.Values, which can ideally be reused here but are
  // currently only package visible.

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's