if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not serialize prevResult: %v", err)
		}
		res, err := version.NewResult(conf.CNIVersion, resultBytes)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not parse prevResult: %v", err)
		}
		conf.RawPrevResult = nil
		conf.PrevResult, err = cniv1.NewResultFromResult(res)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not convert result to current version: %v", err)
		}

 * such custom interfaces directly; they are implemented only in subclasses. Therefore, forwarding
 * {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an

   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work
   *     }
   *   }
   * </pre>
   *
   * <p>...or you could respond to stop requests by implementing {@link #triggerShutdown()}, which

     *
     * <p>Since the last element of the array is actually in the middle of the sorted structure, a
     * childless aunt node could be smaller, which would corrupt the invariant if this element
     * becomes the new parent of the aunt node. In that case, we first switch the last element with
     * its aunt node, before returning.
     */
    int swapWithConceptuallyLastElement(E actualLastElement) {

      }
      // We could delegate to super now but it would still box too much
      if (!(object instanceof List)) {
        return false;
      }
      List<?> that = (List<?>) object;
      if (this.size() != that.size()) {
        return false;
      }
      int i = parent.start;
      // Since `that` is very likely RandomAccess we could avoid allocating this iterator...

      }
      // We could delegate to super now but it would still box too much
      if (!(object instanceof List)) {
        return false;
      }
      List<?> that = (List<?>) object;
      if (this.size() != that.size()) {
        return false;
      }
      int i = parent.start;
      // Since `that` is very likely RandomAccess we could avoid allocating this iterator...

 * `server_max_window_bits`. This harms our ability to support these parameters:
 *
 *  * If `client_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp must close the web socket with code 1010.
 *    Otherwise it would compress values in a way that servers could not decompress.
 *  * If `server_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp will waste memory on an oversized buffer.
 *
 * See [RFC 7692, 7.1][rfc_7692] for details on negotiation process.
 *

   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {
    // It would be nice to be able to return a real concurrent
    // collection like ConcurrentLinkedQueue, so that e.g. concurrent
    // iteration would work, but that would not be GWT-compatible.
    // We are not "just" inheriting from ArrayList here as this doesn't work for J2kt.
    return new AbstractList<T>() {

            //
            // If we were to cancel taskFuture, that would let the next task start while the old
            // one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the
            // callable actually completes. (We could detect completion in our wrapper
            // `AsyncCallable task`.) However, our contract also promises:

Alternatively, we could send the GOAWAY prior to the pod termination (assuming this allows existing and new connections to function still).

## Ztunnel Shutdown/Upgrade/Restart

This could be upgrading to a new version, or changing some part of the DaemonSet spec, etc.

### Ztunnel Shutdown Requirements