func (h *Target) Cancel() {
	h.status.Store(statusClosed)
	h.storeCtxCancel()

	// Wait for messages to be sent...
	h.wg.Wait()

	// Set logch to nil and close it.
	// This will block all Send operations,
	// and finish the existing ones.
	// All future ones will be discarded.
	h.logChMu.Lock()
	xioutil.SafeClose(h.logCh)
	h.logCh = nil
	h.logChMu.Unlock()

      clientTestRule.newClient().newCall(
        Request
          .Builder()
          .url("https://$uriHost:$uriPort/")
          .build(),
      ) as RealCall
  }

  @AfterEach fun tearDown() {
    factory.close()
  }

  @Test fun singleRoute() {
    val address = factory.newAddress()
    val routeSelector = newRouteSelector(address)
    assertThat(routeSelector.hasNext()).isTrue()
    dns[uriHost] = dns.allocate(1)

* En muchos casos, es mejor entender su **problema subyacente o caso de uso**, porque podría haber una mejor manera de resolverlo que lo que están intentando hacer.

### Pide cerrar { #ask-to-close }

Si responden, hay una alta probabilidad de que hayas resuelto su problema, felicidades, ¡**eres un héroe**! 🦸

* Ahora, si eso resolvió su problema, puedes pedirles que:

  }

  private static void skipHelper(long n, int expect, InputStream in) throws IOException {
    ByteStreams.skipFully(in, n);
    assertEquals(expect, in.read());
    in.close();
  }

  private static final byte[] bytes = new byte[] {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, 0x76, 0x54, 0x32, 0x10};

  public void testNewDataInput_empty() {
    byte[] b = new byte[0];

* Em muitos casos, é melhor entender o **problema subjacente ou caso de uso**, pois pode haver uma forma melhor de resolver do que aquilo que estão tentando fazer.

### Peça para encerrar { #ask-to-close }

Se a pessoa responder, há uma grande chance de você ter resolvido o problema, parabéns, **você é um herói**! 🦸

* Agora, se isso resolveu o problema, você pode pedir para:

   * ExecutorService#shutdownNow()} and returns.
   *
   * <p>For a version of this method that waits <i>indefinitely</i>, use {@link
   * ExecutorService#close}.
   *
   * @param service the {@code ExecutorService} to shut down
   * @param timeout the maximum time to wait for the {@code ExecutorService} to terminate

			})
			replLogOnceIf(ctx, fmt.Errorf("unable to read source object %s/%s(%s): %w", bucket, object, objInfo.VersionID, err), object+":"+objInfo.VersionID)
		}
		return rinfo
	}
	defer gr.Close()

	objInfo := gr.ObjInfo

	// make sure we have the latest metadata for metrics calculation
	rinfo.PrevReplicationStatus = objInfo.TargetReplicationStatus(tgt.ARN)

// additional operations in the lookup path. Alternative approaches were tested:
//   - [128]bool with explicit bounds check (if c >= 128): introduces branches
//     that cause pipeline stalls, resulting in ~70% slower performance
//   - [128]bool with masking (c&0x7f): eliminates bounds checks but the AND
//     operation still costs ~10% performance compared to direct indexing
//

*/\n\nconst NAME = 'alert'\nconst DATA_KEY = 'bs.alert'\nconst EVENT_KEY = `.${DATA_KEY}`\n\nconst EVENT_CLOSE = `close${EVENT_KEY}`\nconst EVENT_CLOSED = `closed${EVENT_KEY}`\nconst CLASS_NAME_FADE = 'fade'\nconst CLASS_NAME_SHOW = 'show'\n\n/**\n * Class definition\n */\n\nclass Alert extends BaseComponent {\n  // Getters\n  static get NAME() {\n    return NAME\n  }\n\n  // Public\n  close() {\n    const closeEvent = EventHandler.trigger(this._element, EVENT_CLOSE)\n\n    if (closeEvent.defaultPrevented)...

   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of elements added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static <E> Builder<E> builderWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {