//             System.runFinalization();
  //         }
  //         System.exit(0);
  //     }

  //     public static TestSuite newTestSuite(Object... suiteOrClasses) {
  //         TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
  //         for (Object suiteOrClass : suiteOrClasses) {
  //             if (suiteOrClass instanceof TestSuite)
  //                 suite.addTest((TestSuite) suiteOrClass);

(if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to
produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it.

  The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all
the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable
work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to
control those activities.  However, it does not include the work's

    }

    @Override
    public void acceptAllColumnMap(Entity entity, Map<String, ? extends Object> allColumnMap) {
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractPrimaryKeyMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractAllColumnMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;

    }

    @Override
    public void acceptAllColumnMap(Entity entity, Map<String, ? extends Object> allColumnMap) {
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractPrimaryKeyMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Object> extractAllColumnMap(Entity entity) {
        return null;

  }

  /** Returns a {@link NetworkBuilder} for building directed networks. */
  public static NetworkBuilder<Object, Object> directed() {
    return new NetworkBuilder<>(true);
  }

  /** Returns a {@link NetworkBuilder} for building undirected networks. */
  public static NetworkBuilder<Object, Object> undirected() {
    return new NetworkBuilder<>(false);
  }

  /**

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "x": {"title": "X", "type": "number"},
                        "y": {"title": "Y", "type": "number"},
                    },
                },
                "HTTPValidationError": {
                    "title": "HTTPValidationError",
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {

| ----------|-------------|----------------------------------------
| xlHeader  | [4]byte     | `'X', 'L', '2', ' '`
| xlVersion | [4]byte     | `'1', ' ', ' ', ' '`
| xlMetaV2  | msgp object | All versions as single messagepack object
| [EOF] | |

### v1.1+

Version 1.1 added inline data, which will be placed after the metadata.

Therefore, the metadata is wrapped as a binary array for easy skipping.

      return columnComparator();
    }

    int compare(Object a, Object b) {
      // pretend we can compare anything
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
      Comparator<Object> cmp = (Comparator<Object>) comparator();
      return cmp.compare(a, b);
    }

    boolean rangeContains(@CheckForNull Object o) {
      return o != null
          && (lowerBound == null || compare(lowerBound, o) <= 0)