无论如何，您都可以像这样运行它：

<div class="termy">

```console
$ uvicorn main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8080 --workers 4
<font color="#A6E22E">INFO</font>:     Uvicorn running on <b>http://0.0.0.0:8080</b> (Press CTRL+C to quit)
<font color="#A6E22E">INFO</font>:     Started parent process [<font color="#A1EFE4"><b>27365</b></font>]
<font color="#A6E22E">INFO</font>:     Started server process [<font color="#A1EFE4">27368</font>]

	"BCC":   true,
	"BLO":   true,
	"BMI":   true,
	"BPL":   true,
	"BVS":   true,
	"BVC":   true,
	"BHI":   true,
	"BLS":   true,
	"BGE":   true,
	"BLT":   true,
	"BGT":   true,
	"BLE":   true,
	"CALL":  true,
	"CBZ":   true,
	"CBZW":  true,
	"CBNZ":  true,
	"CBNZW": true,
	"JMP":   true,
	"TBNZ":  true,
	"TBZ":   true,

	// ADR isn't really a jump, but it takes a PC or label reference,

 *       returned)
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>Alas, {@link #reverse} is a little different. As you read backwards through a chain and
 * encounter a call to {@code reverse}, continue working backwards until a result is determined, and
 * then reverse that result.
 *
 * <h3>Additional notes</h3>
 *

    throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Index exceeds specified range");
  }

  /**
   * Helper method to grow the character buffer as needed, this only happens once in a while so it's
   * ok if it's in a method call. If the index passed in is 0 then no copying will be done.
   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {

### 📱 & 🩺 🎏 🕰

🚥 👆 🏃 🖼 ⏮️, ✅:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ uvicorn tutorial001:app --reload

<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
```

</div>

Uvicorn 🔢 🔜 ⚙️ ⛴ `8000`, 🧾 🔛 ⛴ `8008` 🏆 🚫 ⚔.

### ✍

ℹ ⏮️ ✍ 📶 🌅 👍 ❗ &amp; ⚫️ 💪 🚫 🔨 🍵 ℹ ⚪️➡️ 👪. 👶 👶

📥 📶 ℹ ⏮️ ✍.

#### 💁‍♂ &amp; 📄

      if (value == 8) {
        iter.remove();
      }
    }
    assertIntact(q);
    assertThat(result).containsExactly(1, 15, 13, 8, 14);
  }

  /**
   * This tests a special case of the removeAt() call. Moving an element sideways on the heap could
   * break the invariants. Sometimes we need to bubble an element up instead of trickling down. See
   * implementation.
   */
  public void testInvalidatingRemove() {

      if (modCount != expectedModCount) {
        throw new ConcurrentModificationException();
      }
      if (toRemove == null) {
        throw new IllegalStateException("no calls to next() since the last call to remove()");
      }
      delete(toRemove);
      expectedModCount = modCount;
      toRemove = null;
    }

    abstract T output(BiEntry<K, V> entry);
  }

  @Override

   *
   * Here is an example of storedPermitsToWaitTime: If storedPermits == 10.0, and we want 3 permits,
   * we take them from storedPermits, reducing them to 7.0, and compute the throttling for these as
   * a call to storedPermitsToWaitTime(storedPermits = 10.0, permitsToTake = 3.0), which will
   * evaluate the integral of the function from 7.0 to 10.0.
   *