export MINIO_BROWSER=off
export MINIO_ROOT_USER="minio"
export MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD="minio123"

# Download AWS CLI
echo -n "Download and install AWS CLI"
rm -rf /usr/local/aws-cli || sudo rm -rf /usr/local/aws-cli
curl "https://awscli.amazonaws.com/awscli-exe-linux-x86_64.zip" -o "awscliv2.zip"
unzip -qq awscliv2.zip
./aws/install || sudo ./aws/install
echo "done"

# Add credentials to ~/.aws/credentials
if ! [ -d ~/.aws ]; then

    }

    @Override
    protected HashCode makeHash() {
      if (!finished) {
        // processRemaining does teardown we always want to do -- the folding together of the four
        // rolling CRCs.  So we call it on an empty ByteBuffer if we didn't already.
        processRemaining(EMPTY);
      }
      return HashCode.fromInt(~crc0);
    }

    static final int[] byteTable = {

    }

    /**
     * Returns a string in the format specified by {@link MoreObjects#toStringHelper(Object)}.
     *
     * <p>After calling this method, you can keep adding more properties to later call toString()
     * again and get a more complete representation of the same object; but properties cannot be
     * removed, so this only allows limited reuse of the helper instance. The helper allows

   *
   * <p>Use this method instead of {@link File#createTempFile(String, String)} when you wish to
   * create a directory, not a regular file. A common pitfall is to call {@code createTempFile},
   * delete the file and create a directory in its place, but this leads a race condition which can
   * be exploited to create security vulnerabilities, especially when executable files are to be

Having another process manager inside the container (as would be with multiple workers) would only add **unnecessary complexity** that you are most probably already taking care of with your cluster system.

### Containers with Multiple Processes and Special Cases { #containers-with-multiple-processes-and-special-cases }

import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
import java.io.Writer;
import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
import java.util.Date;

import org.codelibs.core.io.CloseableUtil;
import org.codelibs.curl.CurlResponse;
import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.dict.DictionaryException;
import org.codelibs.fess.dict.DictionaryFile.PagingList;
import org.codelibs.fess.dict.DictionaryManager;

   * Math#addExact(long, long)} instead. Note that if both arguments are {@code int} values, writing
   * {@code Math.addExact(a, b)} will call the {@link Math#addExact(int, int)} overload, not {@link
   * Math#addExact(long, long)}. Also note that adding two {@code int} values can <b>never</b>
   * overflow a {@code long}, so you can just write {@code (long) a + b}.
   *

    h ^= h >>> 10;
    h += h << 3;
    h ^= h >>> 6;
    h += (h << 2) + (h << 14);
    return h ^ (h >>> 16);
  }

  /**
   * This method is a convenience for testing. Code should call {@link Segment#newEntry} directly.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  ReferenceEntry<K, V> newEntry(K key, int hash, @Nullable ReferenceEntry<K, V> next) {
    Segment<K, V> segment = segmentFor(hash);
    segment.lock();

	BICS R19->12, R1, R23                      // 3730b3ea
	BICS R19, R1, R23                          // 370033ea
	BICS R19>>0, R1, R23                       // 370073ea
	CALL -1(PC)                                // ffffff97
	CALL (R15)                                 // e0013fd6
	JMP  (R29)                                 // a0031fd6
	BRK $35943                                 // e08c31d4

 *       returned)
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>Alas, {@link #reverse} is a little different. As you read backwards through a chain and
 * encounter a call to {@code reverse}, continue working backwards until a result is determined, and
 * then reverse that result.
 *
 * <h3>Additional notes</h3>
 *