/**
   * Flattens a class's type hierarchy into a set of {@code Class} objects including all
   * superclasses (transitively) and all interfaces implemented by these superclasses.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static ImmutableSet<Class<?>> flattenHierarchy(Class<?> concreteClass) {
    return flattenHierarchyCache.getUnchecked(concreteClass);
  }

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * This class provides a skeletal implementation of {@link Network}. It is recommended to extend
 * this class rather than implement {@link Network} directly.
 *
 * <p>The methods implemented in this class should not be overridden unless the subclass admits a
 * more efficient implementation.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type
 * @since 20.0
 */

 * multiple variants of ASN.1, including:
 *
 *  * DER: Distinguished Encoding Rules. This further constrains ASN.1 for deterministic encoding.
 *  * BER: Basic Encoding Rules.
 *
 * This class was implemented according to the [X.690 spec][[x690]], and under the advice of
 * [Lets Encrypt's ASN.1 and DER][asn1_and_der] guide.
 *
 * [x690]: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690

Specific security vs. connectivity decisions are implemented by [ConnectionSpec](https://square.github.io/okhttp/4.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-connection-spec/). OkHttp includes four built-in connection specs:

	ipList = set.NewStringSet()
	for _, addr := range addrs {
		ipList.Add(addr)
	}

	return ipList, err
}

// sortIPs - sort ips based on higher octets.
// The logic to sort by last octet is implemented to
// prefer CIDRs with higher octets, this in-turn skips the
// localhost/loopback address to be not preferred as the
// first ip on the list. Subsequently this list helps us print

        BasicConstraints(
          ca = it[0] as Boolean,
          maxIntermediateCas = it[1] as Long?,
        )
      },
    )

  /**
   * Note that only a subset of available choices are implemented.
   *
   * ```
   * GeneralName ::= CHOICE {
   *   otherName                       [0]     OtherName,
   *   rfc822Name                      [1]     IA5String,

* The frontend (running in the user's browser) sends that `username` and `password` to a specific URL in our API (declared with `tokenUrl="token"`).
* The API checks that `username` and `password`, and responds with a "token" (we haven't implemented any of this yet).
    * A "token" is just a string with some content that we can use later to verify this user.
    * Normally, a token is set to expire after some time.

phase.

As part of the differences that make Eager mode easier to debug, the [shape
inference
functions](https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/create_op#define_the_op_interface)
are skipped, and any checks implemented inside the shape inference code are not
executed.

The security impact of skipping those checks should be low, since the attack
scenario would require a malicious user to be able to control the model which as

      try {
        pendingDescription = pendingToString();
      } catch (RuntimeException e) {
        // Don't call getMessage or toString() on the exception, in case the exception thrown by the
        // subclass is implemented with bugs similar to the subclass.
        pendingDescription = "Exception thrown from implementation: " + e.getClass();
      }
      // The future may complete during or before the call to getPendingToString, so we use null

    } catch (CancellationException e) {
      // TODO(user): verify future behavior - unify logic with getFutureValue in AbstractFuture. This
      // code should be unreachable with correctly implemented Futures.
      // Cancel this future and return.
      // At this point, inputFuture is cancelled and outputFuture doesn't exist, so the value of
      // mayInterruptIfRunning is irrelevant.
      cancel(false);