* {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an
 * interface-specific subclass of {@code ForwardingObject}, such as {@link ForwardingList}, to

    assertThat(networkA).isEqualTo(networkB);
  }

  /**
   * In some cases our graph implementations return custom sets that define their own size() and
   * contains(). Verify that these sets are consistent with the elements of their iterator.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T> Set<T> sanityCheckSet(Set<T> set) {
    assertThat(set).hasSize(Iterators.size(set.iterator()));
    for (Object element : set) {

			t.Errorf("Test case %d, expect to pass but failed. Wanted modTime: %s, got modTime: %s\n", i+1, testCase.time, ctime)
		}
	}
}

// TestListOnlineDisks - checks if listOnlineDisks and outDatedDisks
// are consistent with each other.
func TestListOnlineDisks(t *testing.T) {
	if runtime.GOOS == globalWindowsOSName {
		t.Skip()
	}

	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
	defer cancel()

          !item.equals(NotAnInstance.EQUAL_TO_NOTHING));
      assertTrue(item + " must be Object#equals to itself", item.equals(item));
      assertEquals(
          "the Object#hashCode of " + item + " must be consistent",
          item.hashCode(),
          item.hashCode());
      if (!(item instanceof String)) {
        assertTrue(
            item + " must not be Object#equals to its Object#toString representation",

   * required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equal
   *       Objects.equal}{@code (a, b)} implies that {@code predicate.apply(a) ==
   *       predicate.apply(b))}.
   * </ul>
   *

      assertTrue(item + " must be equivalent to itself", equivalence.equivalent(item, item));
      assertEquals(
          "the hash of " + item + " must be consistent",
          equivalence.hash(item),
          equivalence.hash(item));
    }
  }

      assertTrue(item + " must be equivalent to itself", equivalence.equivalent(item, item));
      assertEquals(
          "the hash of " + item + " must be consistent",
          equivalence.hash(item),
          equivalence.hash(item));
    }
  }

-   Ensure you have signed the
    [Contributor License Agreement (CLA)](https://cla.developers.google.com/).
-   Check if your changes are consistent with the
    [guidelines](#general-guidelines-and-philosophy-for-contribution).
-   Changes are consistent with the [Coding Style](#c-coding-style).
-   Run the [unit tests](#running-unit-tests).

## How to become a contributor and submit your own code

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman

            // from being reused. Otherwise we're still obligated to transmit the request body to
            // leave the connection in a consistent state.
            exchange.noNewExchangesOnConnection()
          }
        }
      } else {
        exchange.noRequestBody()
      }

      if (requestBody == null || !requestBody.isDuplex()) {