}

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

		ErrorHandler:  f.customErrHandler,
	}

	if f.ErrorHandler != nil {
		revproxy.ErrorHandler = f.ErrorHandler
	}

	revproxy.ServeHTTP(w, outReq)
}

// customErrHandler is originally implemented to avoid having the following error
//
//	`http: proxy error: context canceled` printed by Golang
func (f *Forwarder) customErrHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, err error) {

     */
    public SmbTransport createTransport(NetworkInterfaceInfo localInterface, NetworkInterfaceInfo remoteInterface) throws IOException {
        // This would need to be implemented based on the actual SmbTransport constructor
        // For now, return null - this needs integration with the actual transport creation

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is
 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *

			exception: []string{"B"},
			ok:        true,
			out:       "",
		},

		// Test that a feature required on a subset of ports is implicitly satisfied
		// by the same feature being implemented on all ports. That is, it shouldn't
		// say "pkg syscall (darwin-amd64), type RawSockaddrInet6 struct" is missing.
		// See https://go.dev/issue/4303.
		{
			name: "contexts reconverging after api/next/* update",

Platforms typically extend the features of other platforms to add this support.

By understanding the Gradle platforms and their relationships, you can get a feel for where in the Gradle source tree a particular feature is implemented.

See [Gradle platform architecture](platforms.md) for a list of the platforms and more details.

### Gradle runtimes

    assertThrows(
        IllegalStateException.class, () -> builder.orderEntriesByValue(Ordering.natural()));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // we haven't implemented this
  public void testBuilder_orderEntriesByValue_keepingLast() {
    ImmutableMap.Builder<String, Integer> builder =
        new Builder<String, Integer>()
            .orderEntriesByValue(Ordering.natural())

 * this class rather than implement {@link Network} directly.
 *
 * <p>The methods implemented in this class should not be overridden unless the subclass admits a
 * more efficient implementation.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type
 * @since 20.0
 */
@Beta
public abstract class AbstractNetwork<N, E> implements Network<N, E> {

            // When
            PropertyConfiguration testConfig = new PropertyConfiguration(props);

            // Then
            // System properties should take precedence (if implemented)
            String domain = testConfig.getDefaultDomain();
            assertTrue(domain.equals("systemdomain") || domain.equals("propsdomain"));

        } finally {
            // Cleanup

import java.util.logging.Level;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A helper which does some thread-safe operations for aggregate futures, which must be implemented
 * differently in GWT. Namely:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Lazily initializes a set of seen exceptions
 *   <li>Decrements a counter atomically
 * </ul>
 */
@GwtCompatible