assertEquals("test_rank_fusion", rankFusionSearcher.getName());
    }

    public void test_getName_cachesBehavior() {
        // Test that getName() caches the result after first call
        String firstName = rankFusionSearcher.getName();
        String secondName = rankFusionSearcher.getName();
        assertSame(firstName, secondName);

    @Override
    boolean isPartialView() {
      return ImmutableMap.this.isPartialView();
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      // ImmutableSet.of(value).hashCode() == value.hashCode(), so the hashes are the same
      return ImmutableMap.this.hashCode();
    }

    @Override
    UnmodifiableIterator<Entry<K, ImmutableSet<V>>> entryIterator() {

        assertFalse(auth.isAnonymous());
        assertFalse(auth.isGuest());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @EnumSource(SubjectVariant.class)
    @DisplayName("getSubject: caches results and refresh resets cache")
    void testGetSubjectLoginFailuresCacheAndRefresh(SubjectVariant variant) throws Exception {
        JAASAuthenticator auth = buildAuthenticator(variant);

##### Porque usar hashing de senha

Se o seu banco de dados for roubado, o ladrão não terá as senhas em texto simples dos seus usuários, apenas os hashes.

Assim, o ladrão não poderá tentar usar essas mesmas senhas em outro sistema (como muitos usuários usam a mesma senha em todos os lugares, isso seria perigoso).

    private static final int DEFAULT_HASH_ALGORITHM = HASH_ALGO_SHA512;
    private static final int SALT_SIZE = 32; // 32 bytes as per SMB 3.1.1 spec
    private static final int HASH_SIZE_SHA512 = 64; // SHA-512 produces 64-byte hashes

    // Session-specific preauth integrity contexts
    private final ConcurrentMap<String, PreauthIntegrityContext> sessionContexts = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

    // Security configuration

* It takes each **request** that comes to your application.
* It can then do something to that **request** or run any needed code.
* Then it passes the **request** to be processed by the rest of the application (by some *path operation*).
* It then takes the **response** generated by the application (by some *path operation*).

    assertThat(
      base
        .newBuilder()
        .addPathSegments("/d")
        .build()
        .encodedPath,
    ).isEqualTo("/a/b/c//d")

    // Add a string with two slashes: resulting URL gains three slashes.
    assertThat(
      base
        .newBuilder()
        .addPathSegments("//")
        .build()
        .encodedPath,
    ).isEqualTo("/a/b/c///")
    assertThat(

	"github.com/google/uuid"
)

var testUUID = uuid.MustParse("f5c58c61-7175-4018-ab5e-a94fe9c2de4e")

func BenchmarkCrcHash(b *testing.B) {
	cases := []struct {
		key int
	}{
		{16},
		{64},
		{128},
		{256},
		{512},
		{1024},
	}
	for _, testCase := range cases {
		key := randString(testCase.key)
		b.Run("", func(b *testing.B) {
			b.SetBytes(1024)
			b.ReportAllocs()
			b.ResetTimer()
			for b.Loop() {

  `find . -name "*.kt"`
```


Advanced Profiling
------------------

Android Studio’s Advanced Profiling feature rewrites OkHttp bytecode for instrumentation.
Unfortunately it crashes on OkHttp 4.x’s bytecode. Until [Google’s bug][advanced_profiling_bug] is
fixed you must disable advanced profiling in Android Studio.

![Disable Advanced Profiling](../assets/images/******@****.***)

Pero aquí está el punto clave.

El tema de seguridad e inyección de dependencias se escribe una vez.

Y puedes hacerlo tan complejo como desees. Y aún así, tenerlo escrito solo una vez, en un solo lugar. Con toda la flexibilidad.

Pero puedes tener miles de endpoints (*path operations*) usando el mismo sistema de seguridad.