return '0'
		case r == '_', r == '$':
			return r
		default:
			valid = false
			return -1
		}
	}, name)

	if valid {
		// check for simple name or quoted name
		// - letter/underscore followed by one or more letter/digit/underscore
		// - any text between quotes (text cannot contain a quote itself)
		if match, err := regexp.MatchString("^[a_][a0_$]*$", cleaned); err != nil {
			return err
		} else if match {

If you want to secure your API, there are several better things you can do, for example:

* Make sure you have well defined Pydantic models for your request bodies and responses.
* Configure any required permissions and roles using dependencies.

        val bindingContext = analysisContext.analyze(propertyPsi, Fe10AnalysisFacade.AnalysisMode.PARTIAL)
        (bindingContext[BindingContext.VARIABLE, propertyPsi] as? PropertyDescriptor)?.getter
    }

    override val origin: KtSymbolOrigin
        get() = withValidityAssertion { propertyPsi.ktSymbolOrigin }

    override val psi: PsiElement?
        get() = withValidityAssertion { null }

            }
        else firFunctionSymbol.valueParameters[valueParameterReference.parameterIndex]
    )

    // Util function to avoid hard coding names of the classes. Type inference will do a better job figuring out the best type to cast to.
    // This visitor isn't type-safe anyway
    private inline fun <reified T> ConeContractDescriptionElement.accept() =

         * The keys to the map parameter are used as the names of the files to which to apply the transform - there is only one entry.
         * It would perhaps be better to do this more selectively instead of applying this transform so broadly and having
         * it just no-op in most cases.
         */
        registerTransform(Minify::class) {

name: Feature Enhancement Request
description: I want to make an existing feature better
labels: ["type=enhancement"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

    // GWT's ConcurrentHashMap is a wrapper around HashMap, but it rejects null keys, which matches
    // the behaviour of the non-GWT implementation of newConcurrentHashSet().
    // On the other hand HashSet might be better for code size if apps aren't
    // already using Collections.newSetFromMap and ConcurrentHashMap.
    return Collections.newSetFromMap(new ConcurrentHashMap<E, Boolean>());
  }

		t.Fatal("addr2line output must have 2 lines")
	}
	funcname = f[0]
	pathAndLineNo := f[1]
	f = strings.Split(pathAndLineNo, ":")
	if runtime.GOOS == "windows" && len(f) == 3 {
		// Reattach drive letter.
		f = []string{f[0] + ":" + f[1], f[2]}
	}
	if len(f) != 2 {
		t.Fatalf("no line number found in %q", pathAndLineNo)
	}
	return funcname, f[0], f[1]
}

const symName = "cmd/addr2line.TestAddr2Line"

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): if we start to override indexOf/lastIndexOf under GWT, we'll want some way to
   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {

 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class AbstractSortedMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractMultiset<E>