The *path operation* itself also declares a scope, `"items"`, so this will also be in the list of `security_scopes.scopes` passed to `get_current_user`.

Here's how the hierarchy of dependencies and scopes looks like:

* The *path operation* `read_own_items` has:
    * Required scopes `["items"]` with the dependency:
    * `get_current_active_user`:
        *  The dependency function `get_current_active_user` has:

///

If you go to your browser you will see that now the docs show your new section (the info box at the top is gone). 🎉

Now you can translate it all and see how it looks as you save the file.

#### Don't Translate these Pages

🚨 Don't translate:

* Files under `reference/`
* `release-notes.md`
* `fastapi-people.md`
* `external-links.md`
* `newsletter.md`

   * might not (and the answer might change while we're building the array).
   *
   * TODO: cpovirk - Is this an issue anywhere anymore? It looks to have been fixed for Java 8
   * (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7121314) and before Lollipop
   * (https://r.android.com/47508). We *would* need to worry for J2KT, whose own concurrency support

 * {@link #testEquals}, {@link #testNulls} and {@link #testSerializable}.
 *
 * <p>For testing against the returned instances from a static factory class, such as
 *
 * <pre>
 * interface Book {...}
 * public class Books {
 *   public static Book hardcover(String title) {...}
 *   public static Book paperback(String title) {...}
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>please use {@link ClassSanityTester#forAllPublicStaticMethods}.
 *

  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

  ##   set, choosing the default provisioner.  (gp2 on AWS, standard on
  ##   GKE, AWS & OpenStack)
  ##
  ## Storage class of PV to bind. By default it looks for standard storage class.
  ## If the PV uses a different storage class, specify that here.
  storageClass: ""
  volumeName: ""
  accessMode: ReadWriteOnce
  size: 500Gi

}{
	{ETag: "", IsSealed: false},                                  // 0
	{ETag: "90682b8e8cc7609c4671e1d64c73fc30", IsSealed: false},  // 1
	{ETag: "f201040c9dc593e39ea004dc1323699bcd", IsSealed: true}, // 2 not valid ciphertext but looks like sealed ETag
	{ETag: "20000f00fba2ee2ae4845f725964eeb9e092edfabc7ab9f9239e8344341f769a51ce99b4801b0699b92b16a72fa94972", IsSealed: true}, // 3
}

func TestIsETagSealed(t *testing.T) {

  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

      annotatedTypeExists()
          ? NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_AND_TYPE_USE_ANNOTATIONS
          : NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_ANNOTATIONS_ONLY;

  /**
   * Looks for declaration nullness annotations and, if supported, type-use nullness annotations.
   *
   * <p>Under Android VMs, the methods for retrieving type-use annotations don't exist. This means

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Checks that a Hasher returns the same HashCode when given the same input, and also that the
   * collision rate looks sane.
   */
  static void assertInvariants(HashFunction hashFunction) {
    int objects = 100;
    Set<HashCode> hashcodes = Sets.newHashSetWithExpectedSize(objects);
    Random random = new Random(314159);