```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph global[global env]
        harry-1[<strike>harry v1</strike>]
        style harry-1 fill:#ccc,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
        harry-3[harry v3]
    end
    subgraph stone-project[philosophers-stone project]
        stone(philosophers-stone) -.-x|⛔️| harry-1
    end
    subgraph azkaban-project[prisoner-of-azkaban project]

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph global[global env]
        harry-1[<strike>harry v1</strike>]
        style harry-1 fill:#ccc,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
        harry-3[harry v3]
    end
    subgraph stone-project[philosophers-stone project]
        stone(philosophers-stone) -.-x|⛔️| harry-1
    end
    subgraph azkaban-project[prisoner-of-azkaban project]

# End of iteration Result = Composite W = 41 B = 2 # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 41 B = 3a # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 55 B = 40 # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 55 B = 7 # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 55 B = 23 # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 55 B = 2e # End of iteration Result = Composite W = 55 B = 2a # W below is composite, but it is one of the worst case scenarios for # Miller-Rabin, from Wycheproof tests. 1/4 of witnesses report the value...

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph global[global env]
        harry-1[<strike>harry v1</strike>]
        style harry-1 fill:#ccc,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
        harry-3[harry v3]
    end
    subgraph stone-project[philosophers-stone project]
        stone(philosophers-stone) -.-x|⛔️| harry-1
    end
    subgraph azkaban-project[prisoner-of-azkaban project]

	expected string
	err      error
}{
	{"", 0, 0, "", nil},
	{"aaa", 0, 3, "aaa", nil},
	{"foobar", 0, 2, "fo", nil},
	{"a", 0, 2, "a", io.EOF},
	{"helloworld", 4, 3, "owo", nil},
	{"helloworld", 5, 5, "world", nil},
	{"helloworld", 5, 6, "world", io.EOF},
	{"helloworld", 10, 1, "", io.EOF},
}

func TestPeek(t *testing.T) {
	for _, test := range peekTests {
		buf := NewBufferString(test.buffer)

- go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2: v2.305.5 → v2.305.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7
- go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3: v3.5.5 → v3.5.7

low {\n  .placeholder {\n    animation: placeholder-glow 2s ease-in-out infinite;\n  }\n}\n\n@keyframes placeholder-glow {\n  50% {\n    opacity: $placeholder-opacity-min;\n  }\n}\n\n.placeholder-wave {\n  mask-image: linear-gradient(130deg, $black 55%, rgba(0, 0, 0, (1 - $placeholder-opacity-min)) 75%, $black 95%);\n  mask-size: 200% 100%;\n  animation: placeholder-wave 2s linear infinite;\n}\n\n@keyframes placeholder-wave {\n  100% {\n    mask-position: -200% 0%;\n  }\n}\n","// All-caps `RGBA()`...

    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually
    // waited and assert based on that time. Empirically, the race where the thread ends up waiting
    // for 5.5 seconds happens about 2% of the time.
    boolean longWait = NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(thread.timeSpentBlocked) >= 5;
    // Count how long it actually took to return; we'll accept any number between the expected delay

如果你再次嘗試運行 `philosophers-stone`，很可能會**無法正常運作**，因為它需要的是 `harry` 版本 `1`。

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph global[全域環境]
        harry-1[<strike>harry v1</strike>]
        style harry-1 fill:#ccc,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
        harry-3[harry v3]
    end
    subgraph stone-project[專案 philosophers-stone]
        stone(philosophers-stone) -.-x|⛔️| harry-1
    end
    subgraph azkaban-project[專案 prisoner-of-azkaban]

如果你再次尝试运行 `philosophers-stone`，有可能它**无法正常工作**，因为它需要 `harry` 版本 `1`。

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph global[全局环境]
        harry-1[<strike>harry v1</strike>]
        style harry-1 fill:#ccc,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
        harry-3[harry v3]
    end
    subgraph stone-project[工程 philosophers-stone]
        stone(philosophers-stone) -.-x|⛔️| harry-1
    end
    subgraph azkaban-project[工程 prisoner-of-azkaban]