}
    // The top bit is set, which means that the double value is going to come from the top 53 bits.
    // So we can ignore the bottom 11, except for rounding. We can unsigned-shift right 1, aka
    // unsigned-divide by 2, and convert that. Then we'll get exactly half of the desired double
    // value. But in the specific case where the bottom two bits of the original number are 01, we
    // want to replace that with 1 in the shifted value for correct rounding.

    class ConstantsValidationTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("All fragment flags should have unique values")
        void testFragmentFlagsUniqueness() {
            // Verify that fragment flags are unique and follow bit pattern
            assertEquals(1, Integer.bitCount(DcerpcConstants.DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG), "DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG should be a single bit");

 *
 * <p>There are three Win32 function calls provided by the Windows SDK
 * that are important in the context of using jCIFS. They are:
 *
 * <ul>
 * <li> <code>CallNamedPipe</code> A message-type pipe call that opens,
 *      writes to, reads from, and closes the pipe in a single operation.
 * <li> <code>TransactNamedPipe</code> A message-type pipe call that
 *      writes to and reads from an existing pipe descriptor in one operation.

It is provided directly by Starlette, but you can import it from `fastapi`:

```python
from fastapi import WebSocket
```

/// tip

When you want to define dependencies that should be compatible with both HTTP and WebSockets, you can define a parameter that takes an `HTTPConnection` instead of a `Request` or a `WebSocket`.

///

::: fastapi.WebSocket
    options:
        members:
            - scope
            - app

        // Assume the server won't send a TLS ServerHello until we send a TLS ClientHello. If
        // that happens, then we will have buffered bytes that are needed by the SSLSocket!
        // This check is imperfect: it doesn't tell us whether a handshake will succeed, just
        // that it will almost certainly fail because the proxy has sent unexpected data.

   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys() {

   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys() {

          // yes, that's a lot of sinks!
          sinks.add(new Sink(chunkSize, bufferSize));
          // For convenience, testing only with big endianness, to match DataOutputStream.
          // I regard highly unlikely that both the little endianness tests above and this one
          // passes, and there is still a little endianness bug lurking around.
        }
      }

      Control control = new Control();

        // Why? The second half of condition2 requires that nodeV equals other.nodeU.
        // We already know that nodeU equals other.nodeU. Combined with the earlier statement,
        // and the transitive property of equality, this implies that nodeU equals nodeV.
        // If nodeU equals nodeV, condition1 == condition2, so checking condition1 is sufficient.

        if (this == obj)
            return true;
        if (obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass())
            return false;
        ChannelInfo that = (ChannelInfo) obj;
        return channelId != null ? channelId.equals(that.channelId) : that.channelId == null;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return channelId != null ? channelId.hashCode() : 0;
    }