你也可以设置 `APIRouter` 的 `route_class` 参数：

{* ../../docs_src/custom_request_and_route/tutorial003_py310.py hl[26] *}

在此示例中，`router` 下的路径操作将使用自定义的 `TimedRoute` 类，响应中会多一个 `X-Response-Time` 头，包含生成响应所用的时间：

* **Intuitive**: Great editor support. <dfn title="also known as auto-complete, autocompletion, IntelliSense">Completion</dfn> everywhere. Less time debugging.
* **Easy**: Designed to be easy to use and learn. Less time reading docs.
* **Short**: Minimize code duplication. Multiple features from each parameter declaration. Fewer bugs.
* **Robust**: Get production-ready code. With automatic interactive documentation.

         */
        protected boolean partial;
        /**
         * The time taken for the search query in milliseconds.
         */
        protected long queryTime;
        /**
         * The search query string.
         */
        protected String searchQuery;
        /**
         * The time when the search request was made.
         */
        protected long requestedTime;
        /**

 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.helper;

import static org.codelibs.core.stream.StreamUtil.stream;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.Map;

     * Get the create action taken by the server
     * @return the createAction
     */
    public final int getCreateAction() {
        return this.createAction;
    }

    /**
     * Get the file creation time
     * @return the creationTime
     */
    public final long getCreationTime() {
        return this.creationTime;
    }

    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}
     *

 */
package org.codelibs.fess.suggest.settings;

import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Base64;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;

    public String value;

    /** The sort order of the label type. */
    public String sortOrder;

    /** The creator of the label type. */
    public String createdBy;

    /** The created time of the label type. */
    public String createdTime;

    /** The version number of the label type. */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Clears the pager fields.
     */
    public void clear() {

    public String id;

    /** Suggest word for search filtering. */
    public String suggestWord;

    /** Creator username for search filtering. */
    public String createdBy;

    /** Creation time for search filtering. */
    public String createdTime;

    /** Version number for search filtering. */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Default constructor for BadWordPager.
     */

 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.bsentity.dbmeta;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity.CrawlingInfo;
import org.dbflute.Entity;
import org.dbflute.dbmeta.AbstractDBMeta;

        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least