* article on <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/ListenableFutureExplained">{@code
 * ListenableFuture}</a>.
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@code ListenableFuture} is to help you chain together a graph of
 * asynchronous operations. You can chain them together manually with calls to methods like {@link
 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, Function, Executor) Futures.transform}, but you will often

     * correctly installed
     *
     * <p>{@link #transitioned}: is set by {@link #transitionService} to indicate that some
     * transition has been performed.
     *
     * <p>Together, they allow us to enforce that all services have their listeners installed prior
     * to any service performing a transition, then we can fail in the ServiceManager constructor
     * rather than in a Service.Listener callback.

     * correctly installed
     *
     * <p>{@link #transitioned}: is set by {@link #transitionService} to indicate that some
     * transition has been performed.
     *
     * <p>Together, they allow us to enforce that all services have their listeners installed prior
     * to any service performing a transition, then we can fail in the ServiceManager constructor
     * rather than in a Service.Listener callback.

        //
        // Note that there is a race condition here which can result in missing
        // a cyclic edge: it's possible for two threads to simultaneous find
        // "safe" edges which together form a cycle. Preventing this race
        // condition efficiently without _introducing_ deadlock is probably
        // tricky. For now, just accept the race condition---missing a warning

     * name associated with SIDs will be required, the SID_FLAG_RESOLVE_SIDS
     * flag should be used which causes all group member SIDs to be resolved
     * together in a single more efficient operation.
     */
    static Map getLocalGroupsMap(String authorityServerName,
                    NtlmPasswordAuthentication auth,
                    int flags) throws IOException {

🍵 ⚙️ 📦, ⚒ 🈸 🏃 🔛 🕴 & ⏮️ ⏏ 💪 ⚠ & ⚠. ✋️ 🕐❔ **👷 ⏮️ 📦** 🌅 💼 👈 🛠️ 🔌 🔢. 👶

## 🧬 - 🔢 🛠️

🚥 👆 ✔️ <abbr title="A group of machines that are configured to be connected and work together in some way.">🌑</abbr> 🎰 ⏮️ **☁**, ☁ 🐝 📳, 🖖, ⚖️ ➕1️⃣ 🎏 🏗 ⚙️ 🛠️ 📎 📦 🔛 💗 🎰, ⤴️ 👆 🔜 🎲 💚 **🍵 🧬** **🌑 🎚** ↩️ ⚙️ **🛠️ 👨‍💼** (💖 🐁 ⏮️ 👨‍🏭) 🔠 📦.

 * <p><a id="iteration"></a>
 *
 * <p><b>Key-grouped iteration.</b> All view collections follow the same iteration order. In all
 * current implementations, the iteration order always keeps multiple entries with the same key
 * together. Any creation method that would customarily respect insertion order (such as {@link
 * #copyOf(Multimap)}) instead preserves key-grouped order by inserting entries for an existing key
 * immediately after the last entry having that key.

// The input must have been already validated.
//
// This function mutates src and returns a normalized map where:
//   - adjacent fragments are coalesced together
//   - only the last fragment may be empty
//   - the endOffset of the last fragment is the total size
func invertSparseEntries(src []sparseEntry, size int64) []sparseEntry {
	dst := src[:0]
	var pre sparseEntry

   *   <li>If many tasks will be triggered by the same event, one heavyweight task may delay other
   *       tasks -- even tasks that are not themselves {@code directExecutor} tasks.
   *   <li>If many such tasks are chained together (such as with {@code
   *       future.transform(...).transform(...).transform(...)....}), they may overflow the stack.
   *       (In simple cases, callers can avoid this by registering all tasks with the same {@link

     * network failure), the said methods will return default values (usually
     * <tt>S-X-Y-Z</tt> strings of fragments of).
     * <p>
     * Alternatively <tt>getSecurity(true)</tt> may be used to resolve all
     * SIDs together and detect network failures.
     * 
     * @return array of ACEs
     * @throws IOException
     */
    ACE[] getSecurity () throws IOException;


    /**