.isEqualTo(3);
  }

  public void testMax_noArgs() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> max());
  }

  public void testMax() {
    assertThat(max(LEAST)).isEqualTo(LEAST);
    assertThat(max(GREATEST)).isEqualTo(GREATEST);
    assertThat(max((char) 8, (char) 6, (char) 7, (char) 5, (char) 3, (char) 0, (char) 9))
        .isEqualTo((char) 9);

    assertThat(Files.hash(i18nFile, sha512()).toString()).isEqualTo(i18nHash);
  }

  public void testMap() throws IOException {
    // Test data
    int size = 1024;
    byte[] bytes = newPreFilledByteArray(size);

    // Setup
    File file = createTempFile();
    Files.write(bytes, file);

    // Test

* Vuelve a traducir, teniendo la buena traducción en su lugar. El resultado ideal sería que el LLM ya no hiciera cambios a la traducción. Eso significa que el prompt general y tu prompt específico del idioma están tan bien como pueden estar (A veces hará algunos cambios aparentemente aleatorios; la razón es que [los LLMs no son algoritmos deterministas](https://doublespeak.chat/#/handbook#deterministic-output)).

Las pruebas:

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tester to ensure forwarding wrapper works by delegating calls to the corresponding method with
 * the same parameters forwarded and return value forwarded back or exception propagated as is.
 *
 * <p>For example:
 *
 * {@snippet :

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testStringConverter_nullPointerTester() throws Exception {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicInstanceMethods(Doubles.stringConverter());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible
  public void testTryParse_withNullNoGwt() {
    assertThat(Doubles.tryParse("null")).isNull();

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getName should handle directory names with trailing slash")
        void testGetName_DirectoryWithSlash() throws CIFSException {
            // Given
            String expectedName = "testdir/";
            when(mockResource.getName()).thenReturn(expectedName);

            // When
            String name = mockResource.getName();

            // Then

      }
    }
  }

  public void testMax_noArgs() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> max());
  }

  public void testMax() {
    assertThat(max(LEAST)).isEqualTo(LEAST);
    assertThat(max(GREATEST)).isEqualTo(GREATEST);
    assertThat(
            max(
                (int) 8L,
                (int) 6L,
                (int) 7L,

    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.compare(0xff1a618b7f65ea12L, 0xff1a618b7f65ea12L)).isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testMax_noArgs() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> max());
  }

  public void testMax() {
    assertThat(max(LEAST)).isEqualTo(LEAST);
    assertThat(max(GREATEST)).isEqualTo(GREATEST);
    assertThat(max(0x5a4316b8c153ac4dL, 8L, 100L, 0L, 0x6cf78a4b139a4e2aL, 0xff1a618b7f65ea12L))

Então utilizamos a requisição diretamente e extraímos o corpo como `bytes`. Isso significa que o FastAPI não vai sequer tentar analisar o payload da requisição como JSON.

E então no nosso código, nós analisamos o conteúdo YAML diretamente e, em seguida, estamos usando novamente o mesmo modelo Pydantic para validar o conteúdo YAML:

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testStringConverter_nullPointerTester() throws Exception {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicInstanceMethods(Ints.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testTryParse() {
    tryParseAndAssertEquals(0, "0");
    tryParseAndAssertEquals(0, "-0");