this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade

      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade

      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade

      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade

      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade

    @SuppressWarnings({
      "unused",
      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",

    @SuppressWarnings({
      "unused",
      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",

      <version>1.0.0+</version>
      <description>Mapping information for a single plugin within this group.</description>
      <comment>NOTE: plugin version is _NOT_ included here, since it is resolved using a separate algorithm in plugins' artifact.</comment>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>name</name>
          <type>String</type>
          <required>true</required>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

## FAQ

> Why is this change needed?

Before, there were two separate mechanisms - S3 objects got encrypted using a KMS,
if present, and the IAM / configuration data got encrypted with the root credentials.
Now, MinIO encrypts IAM / configuration and S3 objects with a KMS, if present. This

    public void addResource(@Nonnull Project project, @Nonnull ProjectScope scope, @Nonnull Resource resource) {
        // TODO: we should not modify the underlying model here, but resources should be stored
        // TODO: in a separate field in the project, however, that could break v3 plugins
        MavenProject prj = getMavenProject(nonNull(project, "project"));