* character encodings according to configured mapping rules.
 *
 * <p>The filter intercepts requests matching configured path patterns and
 * redirects them with proper character encoding applied to parameters.</p>
 */
public class EncodingFilter implements Filter {
    /** Configuration key for encoding rules mapping */
    public static final String ENCODING_MAP = "encodingRules";

        return new UpgradeResult(Collections.emptySet(), Collections.emptySet(), Collections.emptySet());
    }

    /**
     * Merges this result with another result, combining the sets of POMs.
     * This allows proper aggregation of results from multiple strategies without double-counting.
     */
    public UpgradeResult merge(UpgradeResult other) {
        Set<Path> mergedProcessed = new HashSet<>(this.processedPoms);

        testPort = Integer.parseInt(portStr);

        // Create RDMA-enabled context
        Properties props = new Properties();
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.useRDMA", "true");
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.rdmaProvider", "auto");

        PropertyConfiguration config = new PropertyConfiguration(props);
        testContext = new BaseContext(config);
    }

    // ============================================

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a multiset that may contain a non-{@code
   * Comparable} element.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code
   * ImmutableSortedMultiset}, not this dummy version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for (V element : elements) {
      assertFalse("Should not contain value " + element, getMap().containsValue(element));
    }
  }

  /**
   * @return an array of the proper size with {@code null} as the key of the middle element.
   */
  protected Entry<K, V>[] createArrayWithNullKey() {
    Entry<K, V>[] array = createSamplesArray();
    int nullKeyLocation = getNullLocation();

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

     * .
     */
    @Test
    public void testLoadPropertiesInputStreamPropsNull() {
        exception.expect(NullArgumentException.class);
        exception.expectMessage(is("[ECL0008]argument[props] is null."));
        final InputStream inputStream = ResourceUtil.getResourceAsStream("org/codelibs/core/io/test.properties");
        PropertiesUtil.load(null, inputStream);
    }

    /**
     * Test method for