assertEquals(0, controller.noUrlInQueueCount);
        assertEquals(1, controller.waitNewUrlCount);
    }

    /**
     * Test unknown delay type (should not throw exception, just log)
     */
    public void test_delay_unknownType() {
        final TestIntervalController controller = new TestIntervalController();
        controller.delay(999); // Unknown type

import java.time.temporal.ChronoField.SECOND_OF_MINUTE
import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
      .appendValue(HOUR_OF_DAY, 2)
      .appendLiteral(':')

    security_scopes: SecurityScopes,
):
    # This is an incorrect way of using it, this is not checking if the scopes are
    # provided by the token, only if the endpoint is requesting them, but the test
    # here is just to check if FastAPI is indeed registering and passing the scopes
    # correctly when using Security with parameterless dependencies.
    if "a" not in security_scopes.scopes or "b" not in security_scopes.scopes:

    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {
        "size": 30,
        "content": {
            "name": "Maaaagic",
            "price": 42,
            "description": "Just kiddin', no magic here. ✨",
        },
    }


def test_openapi_schema():
    response = client.get("/openapi.json")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {

def test_get_root(client: TestClient):
    response = client.get("/")
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"hello world": "ba"}


def test_uvicorn_run_called_when_run_as_main():  # Just for coverage
    if sys.modules.get(MOD_NAME):
        del sys.modules[MOD_NAME]
    with unittest.mock.patch("uvicorn.run") as uvicorn_run_mock:
        runpy.run_module(MOD_NAME, run_name="__main__")

<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image02.png">
</div>

This means that it will **always have a value**, it's just that sometimes the value could be `None` (or `null` in JSON).

That means that, clients using your API don't have to check if the value exists or not, they can **assume the field will always be there**, but just that in some cases it will have the default value of `None`.

* If you are feeling too generous, you can try to **create an example** like that yourself, just based on the description of the problem. Just keep in mind that this might take a lot of time and it might be better to ask them to clarify the problem first.

### Suggest solutions { #suggest-solutions }

  @Test
  fun testToStringIsClassname() {
    assertThat(Platform().toString()).isEqualTo("Platform")
  }

  @Test
  fun testNotAndroid() {
    platform.assumeNotAndroid()

    // This is tautological so just confirms that it runs.
    assertThat(isAndroid).isEqualTo(false)
  }

<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
```

</div>

/// tip

To set multiple env vars for a single command just separate them with a space, and put them all before the command.

///

And then the `admin_email` setting would be set to `"******@****.***"`.

The `app_name` would be `"ChimichangApp"`.

Number validations also work for `float` values.

Here's where it becomes important to be able to declare <abbr title="greater than"><code>gt</code></abbr> and not just <abbr title="greater than or equal"><code>ge</code></abbr>. As with it you can require, for example, that a value must be greater than `0`, even if it is less than `1`.

So, `0.5` would be a valid value. But `0.0` or `0` would not.