import org.apache.maven.model.PluginExecution;
import org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecution;

/**
 * A stub implementation that assumes an empty lifecycle to bypass interaction with the plugin manager and to avoid
 * plugin artifact resolution from repositories.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class EmptyLifecycleExecutor implements LifecycleExecutor {

    @Override

    <jimfs.version>1.3.1</jimfs.version>
    <jspecify.version>1.0.0</jspecify.version>
    <jsr305.version>3.0.2</jsr305.version>
    <junit.version>4.13.2</junit.version>
    <listenablefuture.version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</listenablefuture.version>
    <maven-antrun-plugin.version>3.2.0</maven-antrun-plugin.version>
    <maven-bundle-plugin.version>5.1.9</maven-bundle-plugin.version>

            // Execute with target model 4.1.0 (should create .mvn directory to avoid root warnings)
            upgradeGoal.testExecuteWithTargetModel(context, "4.1.0");

            Path mvnDir = projectDir.resolve(".mvn");
            assertTrue(
                    Files.exists(mvnDir),
                    ".mvn directory should be created for 4.1.0 to avoid root directory warnings");
        }

        @Test

    void mojoSkipped(ExecutionEvent event);

    void mojoStarted(ExecutionEvent event);

    void mojoSucceeded(ExecutionEvent event);

    void mojoFailed(ExecutionEvent event);

    void forkStarted(ExecutionEvent event);

    void forkSucceeded(ExecutionEvent event);

    void forkFailed(ExecutionEvent event);

    void forkedProjectStarted(ExecutionEvent event);

    display-name: "elastic / elasticsearch - pull request packaging-tests-windows"
    description: "Testing of Elasticsearch pull requests - packaging-tests-windows"
    # We use a hard-coded workspace directory here to avoid hitting windows path length limits
    child-workspace: "C:\\Users\\jenkins\\workspace\\pr-packaging-windows\\${BUILD_NUMBER}"
    project-type: matrix
    node: master
    scm:
      - git:

    checkNotNull(safeChars); // eager for GWT.
    // Avoid any misunderstandings about the behavior of this escaper
    if (safeChars.matches(".*[0-9A-Za-z].*")) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(
          "Alphanumeric characters are always 'safe' and should not be explicitly specified");
    }
    safeChars += "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789";
    // Avoid ambiguous parameters. Safe characters are never modified so if

## Examples

### Configuring connection limit

    loggingInterceptor.setLevel(HttpLoggingInterceptor.Level.BASIC);
    client.networkInterceptors().add(loggingInterceptor);
    ```

    **Warning:** Avoid `Level.HEADERS` and `Level.BODY` in production because
    they could leak passwords and other authentication credentials to insecure
    logs.

 *  **WebSocket API now uses `RequestBody` and `ResponseBody` for messages.**

   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of
   * JUnit test case you are running under. To avoid failing in the face of an exception regardless
   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *
   * <p>tl4j details: For backwards compatibility, {@code junit3.TearDownTestCase} currently does

   * in the list under test matches what is expected.
   */
  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<E> expectedCollection) {
    List<E> expectedList = copyToList(expectedCollection);
    // Avoid expectEquals() here to delay reason manufacture until necessary.
    if (getList().size() != expectedList.size()) {