type.defaultBaselines,
                    display = ParameterDisplay.PROMPT,
                    allowEmpty = true,
                    description = "The baselines you want to run performance tests against. Empty means default baseline.",
                )
                param("env.PERFORMANCE_CHANNEL", performanceTestBuildSpec.channel())
                param("env.PERFORMANCE_DB_PASSWORD_TCAGENT", "%performance.db.password.tcagent%")

                "performance.baselines",
                "",
                display = ParameterDisplay.PROMPT,
                allowEmpty = true,
                description = "The baselines you want to run performance tests against. Empty means default baseline.",
            )
            text(
                "testProject",
                "",
                display = ParameterDisplay.PROMPT,
                allowEmpty = false,

      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct

   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

  private final String relationshipName;
  private final String hashName;

docker-compose -f docker-compose-site1.yaml up -d
docker-compose -f docker-compose-site2.yaml up -d

./mc ready site1/
./mc ready site2/

for i in $(seq 1 10); do
	# mc admin heal -r --remove when used against a LB endpoint
	# behaves flaky, let this run 10 times before giving up
	./mc admin heal -r --remove --json site1/ 2>&1 >/dev/null
	./mc admin heal -r --remove --json site2/ 2>&1 >/dev/null
done

import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension

/**
 * Java HTTP Client.
 *
 * https://openjdk.java.net/groups/net/httpclient/intro.html
 *
 * Baseline test if we ned to validate OkHttp behaviour against other popular clients.
 */
class JavaHttpClientTest {
  @JvmField @RegisterExtension
  val platform = PlatformRule()

  @StartStop
  private val server = MockWebServer()

  @Test fun get() {

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;
import com.google.caliper.Param;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Benchmarks {@link Joiner} against some common implementations of delimiter-based string joining.
 *
 * @author Adomas Paltanavicius
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class JoinerBenchmark {

  private static final String DELIMITER_STRING = ",";

 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one
 *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source

import okhttp3.WebSocketListener
import okhttp3.internal.http2.Settings
import okio.Buffer
import org.junit.Ignore
import org.junit.Test

/**
 * Access every type, function, and property from Kotlin to defend against unexpected regressions in
 * modern 4.0.x kotlin source-compatibility.
 */
@Suppress(
  "ASSIGNED_BUT_NEVER_ACCESSED_VARIABLE",
  "UNUSED_ANONYMOUS_PARAMETER",
  "UNUSED_VALUE",
  "UNUSED_VARIABLE",

 * not wrapped in {@code ExecutionException}. For just a normal failure, use {@link
 * SettableFuture}).
 *
 * <p>Useful for testing the behavior of Future utilities against odd futures.
 *
 * @author Anthony Zana
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullUnmarked
final class UncheckedThrowingFuture<V> extends AbstractFuture<V> {

  public static <V> ListenableFuture<V> throwingError(Error error) {