table.put(cell.getRowKey(), cell.getColumnKey(), cell.getValue());
                    }
                    return transformValues(table, Functions.<Character>identity()).cellSet();
                  }
                })
            .named("TransformValues.cellSet")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

   * @since 27.1
   */
  @Nullable V edgeValueOrDefault(EndpointPair<N> endpoints, @Nullable V defaultValue);

  //
  // ValueGraph identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link ValueGraph} that has the same elements and
   * the same structural relationships as those in this graph.
   *

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(int[], int[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.
   */

   * array as the lesser. For example, {@code [] < ['a'] < ['a', 'b'] < ['b']}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(char[],
   * char[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<char[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

  fun getContentEncodingConnects() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(
        headers = headersOf("Content-Encoding", "identity"),
        body = "ABC",
      ),
    )
    val response = getResponse(newRequest("/"))
    assertThat(response.header("Content-Encoding")).isEqualTo("identity")
    response.body.close()
  }

  @Test
  fun urlContainsQueryButNoPath() {
    server.enqueue(

    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof ContainsPatternPredicate) {
        ContainsPatternPredicate that = (ContainsPatternPredicate) obj;

        // Pattern uses Object (identity) equality, so we have to reach
        // inside to compare individual fields.
        return Objects.equals(pattern.pattern(), that.pattern.pattern())
            && pattern.flags() == that.pattern.flags();
      }