// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test
    void testDependencyManagement() throws Exception {

                "We expected the release transformation and got " + tms.get(0));

        assertTrue(
                tms.get(1) instanceof LatestArtifactTransformation,
                "We expected the latest transformation and got " + tms.get(1));

        assertTrue(
                tms.get(2) instanceof SnapshotTransformation,
                "We expected the snapshot transformation and got " + tms.get(2));

        // The root artifact may, or may not be resolved so we need to check before we attempt to resolve.
        // This is often an artifact like a POM that is taken from disk and we already have hold of the
        // file reference. But this may be a Maven Plugin that we need to resolve from a remote repository
        // as well as its dependencies.

            boolean reverseValue = false;
            if (propValue.startsWith("!")) {
                reverseValue = true;
                propValue = propValue.substring(1);
            }

            // we have a value, so it has to match the system value...
            return reverseValue != propValue.equals(sysValue);
        } else {
            return reverseName != (sysValue != null && !sysValue.isEmpty());
        }
    }

 * the final model of the project being assembled. There is no
 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values
 * down in the lineage are bubbling up where they should.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

 *
 * As a non-default component this now gets a negative priority relative to other implementations
 * of the same interface. Since we want to allow overriding this doesn't matter in this case.
 * (if it did we could add @Priority of 0 to match the priority given to default components.)
 */
@Named
@Singleton
public class DefaultModelProcessor implements ModelProcessor {

                }
                cycle.removeLast();
                stateMap.put(v, DfsState.VISITED);
            } else if (state == DfsState.VISITING) {
                // we are already visiting this vertex, this mean we have a cycle
                int pos = cycle.lastIndexOf(v.label);
                List<String> ret = cycle.subList(pos, cycle.size());
                ret.add(v.label);
                return ret;

            // There is no need to check if the build has created any outputs, see MNG-2222.
            boolean projectCompiledDuringThisSession =
                    project.hasLifecyclePhase("compile") && COMPILE_PHASE_TYPES.contains(type);

            // Check if the project is part of the session (not filtered by -pl, -rf, etc). If so, we check

    /**
     * Adapt a {@link MavenExecutionRequest} to a {@link Settings} object for use in the Maven core.
     * We want to make sure that what is ask for in the execution request overrides what is in the settings.
     * The CLI feeds into an execution request so if a particular value is present in the execution request
     * then we will take that over the value coming from the user settings.
     */

         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */