AssertionFailedError failure = new AssertionFailedError(message);
    failure.initCause(cause);
    return failure;
  }

  // This test covers a bug where an Error thrown from a callback could cause the TimeoutFuture to
  // never complete when timing out.  Notably, nothing would get logged since the Error would get

    int pos = indexIn(string);
    if (pos == -1) {
      return string;
    }

    char[] chars = string.toCharArray();
    int spread = 1;

    // This unusual loop comes from extensive benchmarking
    OUT:
    while (true) {
      pos++;
      while (true) {
        if (pos == chars.length) {
          break OUT;
        }
        if (matches(chars[pos])) {

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;

import com.google.common.testing.AbstractPackageSanityTests;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;

/**
 * Covers basic sanity checks for the entire package.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */

public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {

  private static final AbstractGraphBuilder<?> GRAPH_BUILDER_A =

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * {@link Error} variant of {@link java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException}. As with {@code
 * ExecutionException}, the error's {@linkplain #getCause() cause} comes from a failed task,
 * possibly run in another thread. That cause should itself be an {@code Error}; if not, use {@code
 * ExecutionException} or {@link UncheckedExecutionException}. This allows the client code to

      byte[] msg = new byte[i];
      for (int j = 0; j < i; ++j) {
        msg[j] = (byte) j;
      }
      assertSip(msg, EXPECTED[i]);
    }
  }

  // This test data comes from "SipHash: a fast short-input PRF", "Appendix A: Test values".
  // It can be downloaded here: https://131002.net/siphash/siphash.pdf
  public void test15ByteStringFromSipHashPaper() {
    byte[] message =

        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address

        return first.length() - second.length();
      } else {
        return first.compareTo(second);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Decreasing integer values. A {@code null} comes before any non-null value. */
  private static final Comparator<@Nullable Integer> DECREASING_INT_COMPARATOR =
      Ordering.<Integer>natural().reverse().<Integer>nullsFirst();

  private SetMultimap<String, Integer> create() {

 * in {@linkplain WeakReference weak} references.
 *
 * <p>Usage example:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * ConcurrentMap<Request, Stopwatch> timers = new MapMaker()
 *     .concurrencyLevel(4)
 *     .weakKeys()
 *     .makeMap();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>These features are all optional; {@code new MapMaker().makeMap()} returns a valid concurrent

 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

public class PopulatedCachesTest extends TestCase {
  // we use integers as keys; make sure the range covers some values that ARE cached by
  // Integer.valueOf(int), and some that are not cached. (127 is the highest cached value.)
  static final int WARMUP_MIN = 120;
  static final int WARMUP_MAX = 135;

    }
    if (that == aboveAll()) {
      return -1;
    }
    int result = Range.compareOrThrow(endpoint, that.endpoint);
    if (result != 0) {
      return result;
    }
    // same value. below comes before above
    return Booleans.compare(this instanceof AboveValue, that instanceof AboveValue);
  }

  C endpoint() {
    return endpoint;
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // catching CCE
  @Override