String goal = null;

        Plugin plugin = null;

        String[] tok = task.split(":");

        int numTokens = tok.length;

        if (numTokens >= 4) {
            // We have everything that we need
            //
            // org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.0:process
            //
            // groupId
            // artifactId
            // version

    currently wrong for execution.

    <<NOTE:>> Do we want to fail when we cannot bind a mojo to the lifecycle
    because of offline/online status? That would probably indicate that the user
    was trying to do something they cannot succeed at for now...so we probably

				pop := dirStack[len(dirStack)-1]
				select {
				case <-ctx.Done():
					return ctx.Err()
				case out <- metaCacheEntry{name: pop}:
				}
				if opts.Recursive {
					// Scan folder we found. Should be in correct sort order where we are.
					err := scanDir(pop)
					if err != nil && !IsErrIgnored(err, context.Canceled) {
						internalLogIf(ctx, err)
					}
				}
				dirStack = dirStack[:len(dirStack)-1]
			}

						n++
					}
					atomic.AddInt64(&ops, int64(n))
					atomic.AddInt64(&lat, latency)
				})
				spent := time.Since(t)
				if spent > 0 && n > 0 {
					// Since we are benchmarking n parallel servers we need to multiply by n.
					// This will give an estimate of the total ops/s.
					latency := float64(atomic.LoadInt64(&lat)) / float64(time.Millisecond)

  private var coordinatorWakeUpAt = 0L

  /**
   * When we need a new thread to run tasks, we call [Backend.execute]. A few microseconds later we
   * expect a newly-started thread to call [Runnable.run]. We shouldn't request new threads until
   * the already-requested ones are in service, otherwise we might create more threads than we need.
   *
   * We use [executeCallCount] and [runCallCount] to defend against starting more threads than we

            }
        }

        /*
         * MNG-4312: We neither have reserved all of the above magic expressions nor is their set fixed/well-known (it
         * gets occasionally extended by newer Maven versions). This imposes the risk for existing plugins to
         * unintentionally use such a magic expression for an ordinary property. So here we check whether we

    for (LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache : caches()) {
      cache.getUnchecked(1);
      cache.getUnchecked(2);

      Set<Object> keys = cache.asMap().keySet();
      // We don't know whether these are still in the cache, so we can't assert on the return
      // values of these removes, but the cache should be empty after the removes, regardless.
      keys.remove(1);
      keys.remove(2);

    if (mapEntryAboveToTruncate != null) {
      // we know ( ]
      RangeMapEntry<K, V> rangeMapEntry = mapEntryAboveToTruncate.getValue();
      if (rangeMapEntry.getUpperBound().compareTo(rangeToRemove.upperBound) > 0) {
        // we know ( ] ), and since we dealt with truncating below already,
        // we know [ ( ] )
        putRangeMapEntry(
            rangeToRemove.upperBound,

        // Before we update the version of the artifact, we need to know
        // whether we are working on a transitive dependency or not. This
        // allows depMgmt to always override transitive dependencies, while
        // explicit child override depMgmt (viz. depMgmt should only
        // provide defaults to children, but should override transitives).

      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */