public static ByteArrayDataOutput newDataOutput() {
    return newDataOutput(new ByteArrayOutputStream());
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new {@link ByteArrayDataOutput} instance sized to hold {@code size} bytes before
   * resizing.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code size} is negative
   */
  public static ByteArrayDataOutput newDataOutput(int size) {

     * an int.
     */
    checkNonNegative("a", a);
    checkNonNegative("b", b);
    if (a == 0) {
      // 0 % b == 0, so b divides a, but the converse doesn't hold.
      // BigInteger.gcd is consistent with this decision.
      return b;
    } else if (b == 0) {
      return a; // similar logic
    }
    /*

        == createInstance(factory, args).hashCode();
  }

  // distinctValues is a type-safe class-values mapping, but we don't have a type-safe data
  // structure to hold the mappings.
  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
  private FreshValueGenerator newFreshValueGenerator() {
    FreshValueGenerator generator =
        new FreshValueGenerator() {
          @Override

    return new Builder<>(comparator);
  }

  /**
   * Creates and returns a new builder, configured to build {@code MinMaxPriorityQueue} instances
   * sized appropriately to hold {@code expectedSize} elements.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
  public static Builder<Comparable> expectedSize(int expectedSize) {

    future2 = null;

    /*
     * Futures should be collected even if combiner never runs. This is kind of a silly test, since
     * the combiner is almost certain to hold its own reference to the futures, and a real app would
     * hold a reference to the executor and thus to the combiner. What we really care about is that
     * the futures are released once the combiner is done running. But we happen to provide this

   * implementation, because {@code map.get()} returns a view collection that changes in the course
   * of a call to {@code remove()}. Thus, the expectation doesn't hold that {@code map.remove(x)}
   * returns the same value which {@code map.get(x)} did immediately beforehand.
   */
  @Override
  public void testRemove() {
    final Map<String, Collection<Integer>> map;

   * <i>should</i> hold {@code expectedSize} elements without rebuilding internal data structures.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty {@code CompactLinkedHashMap} with enough capacity to hold {@code
   *     expectedSize} elements without resizing

   * <i>should</i> hold {@code expectedSize} elements without rebuilding internal data structures.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} with enough capacity to hold {@code
   *     expectedSize} elements without resizing

  /**
   * Returns an array size suitable for the backing array of a hash table that uses open addressing
   * with linear probing in its implementation. The returned size is the smallest power of two that
   * can hold setSize elements with the desired load factor.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static int chooseTableSize(int setSize) {
    if (setSize == 1) {
      return 2;
    }

      successor(header, newRoot, header);
      rootReference.checkAndSet(root, newRoot);
      return 0;
    }
    int[] result = new int[1]; // used as a mutable int reference to hold result
    AvlNode<E> newRoot = root.add(comparator(), element, occurrences, result);
    rootReference.checkAndSet(root, newRoot);
    return result[0];
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override