which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the
executable.

If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access
to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy
the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source
code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source
along with the object code.

     * <p><b>Context-sensitive interpretation:</b>
     * A dependency with this path type will not necessarily be placed on the class-path.
     * There are two circumstances where the dependency may nevertheless be placed somewhere else:
     * </p>
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If {@link #MODULES} path type is also set, then the dependency can be placed either on the
     *       class-path or on the module-path, but only one of those. The choice is up to the plugin,

+-----+
${maven.home}
     |
     +--- maven.properties
+-----+

* Group configuration

 As far as properties go for an entire build the maven.properties could be placed at
 the top of the group but I'm not really sure how this might work. There could probably
 also be a directory for plugins.xml and maven.properties.

* Project configuration

     * dependency properties.
     *
     * @return if the artifact can be added to the class path
     *
     * @deprecated A value of {@code true} does not mean that the dependency should
     * be placed on the classpath. See {@code JavaPathType} instead for better analysis.
     */
    @Deprecated
    boolean isAddedToClasspath();

     * So the modular test output directory usually needs to be placed in a {@code --path-module} option.
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If the test output directory is modular, then:
     *     <ul>
     *       <li>If a test module name is identical to a main module name,
     *           place the test directory in a {@code --patch-module} option.</li>
     *       <li>Otherwise, place the test directory on the module-path. However, this case

     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of
     * project b.  We will pick up project c in this case because no
     * restrictions were placed on d.  This demonstrates that a, b, c, & d will
     * all be collected.
     *
     * @throws Exception
     */
    @Test

 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.services.DependencyResolverResult#getDispatchedPaths()
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface PathType {
    /**
     * The type for all paths that could not be placed in any of the types requested by a caller.
     * This type can appear in the return value of a call to
     * {@link Session#resolveDependencies resolveDependencies(...)} when at least one dependency

Derivative Works in Source or Object form. 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s)...

     * The returned list may contain a mix of Java class-path, Java module-path, and other types of path elements.
     *
     * @return the paths of all dependencies
     */
    @Nonnull
    List<Path> getPaths();

    /**
     * Returns the file paths of all dependencies, dispatched according the tool options where to place them.

     * So the modular test output directory usually needs to be placed in a {@code --path-module} option.
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If the test output directory is modular, then:
     *     <ul>
     *       <li>If a test module name is identical to a main module name,
     *           place the test directory in a {@code --patch-module} option.</li>
     *       <li>Otherwise, place the test directory on the module-path. However, this case