// Wait for the listeners to be called, don't rely on the same-thread exec.
    listenerLatch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
    assertTrue(task.isDone());
    assertTrue(task.isCancelled());

    // Make sure we didn't run anything.
    assertEquals(1, runLatch.getCount());
  }

  public void testListenerCalledOnCancelFromRunning() throws Exception {
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester to make sure the {@code iterator().remove()} implementation of {@code Multiset} works when
 * there are multiple occurrences of elements.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeBenchmark {

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeBenchmark {

      // we allow one second worth of work to go in a burst (i.e. take less than a second)
      assertTrue(burst <= 1000);
      long afterBurst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());
      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**

    // make sure that no exception is thrown regardless of value of
    // 'swallowException' when the mock does not throw an exception.
    setupCloseable(false);
    doClose(mockCloseable, false, false);

    setupCloseable(false);
    doClose(mockCloseable, true, false);
  }

  public void testClose_closeableWithEatenException() throws IOException {

   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're
   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */

   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're
   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */

   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

      }
    }
    out.close();

    // Check that source returns the right data
    assertTrue(Arrays.equals(data, source.read()));

    // Make sure that reset deleted the file
    out.reset();
    if (file != null) {
      assertFalse(file.exists());
    }
  }


  public void testThreshold_resetOnFinalize() throws Exception {