* - A new getter `getX` is added, where the old getter is a boolean getter `isX` of an upgraded property
     * - A return type is changed for a getter `getX` of an upgraded property
     *
     * We don't automatically accept changes when the @since annotation is missing, because we want to keep this information on the API.
     */

        if (!keptAccessors.isEmpty()) {
            String formattedLeft = CollectionUtils.join("\n", keptAccessors.keySet());
            throw new RuntimeException("The following accessors were upgraded, but didn't match any removed/changed method:\n\n" + formattedLeft);
        }

        // Find accessors that were removed but shouldn't be
        Map<AccessorKey, ReplacedAccessor> removedAccessors = new HashMap<>(oldAccessorsOfUpgradedProperties);

                    """
                )
            }
        ) {
            assertHasErrors(
                "Method com.example.Task.getSourceCompatibility(): Is not binary compatible." to listOf("Method return type has changed", "Method is now abstract"),
                removed("Method", "Task.setSourceCompatibility(java.lang.String)"),
            )
        }
    }

    @Test

            }
            for (JApiCompatibilityChange change : member.getCompatibilityChanges()) {
                if (IGNORED_CHANGE_TYPES.contains(change)) {
                    return null;
                }
            }
            if (member instanceof JApiHasAnnotations) {
                if (isIncubating((JApiHasAnnotations) member)) {
                    return Violation.warning(member, "Changed public API (@Incubating)");
                }

  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # If a PR is very complex, require 2 approvals
  complex_changes:
    if:
      - {{ ('complex_changes' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ branch | estimatedReviewTime >= 40 }}
      - {{ files | length >= 35 }}
      - {{ includes_src_changes }}
    run:
      - action: set-required-approvals@v1
        args:
          approvals: 2

2. Accept the changes.\
If you are sure that the changes are intentional, follow the steps described in the report.
This includes adding the description of the changes to the `accepted-public-api-changes.json` file, and providing a reason for each change.
You can add the changes to any place in the file, e.g. at the top.

3. Make sure the file with accepted changes is sorted.\

        if (newInterfaces.isEmpty()) {
            return null
        }

        List<String> changes = filterChangesToReport(newClass, newInterfaces)
        if (changes.isEmpty()) {
            return null
        }
        return acceptOrReject(c, changes, Violation.error(c, " introduces internal or incubating interfaces"))
    }

  - comment_added

automations:

  # If a PR contains non-trivial source changes and no tests, add a comment to the PR
  lacks_tests:
    if:
      - {{ ('lacks_tests' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ includes_src_changes }}
      - {{ not (includes_test_changes) }}
      - {{ not (is_docs_only_change) }}
      - {{ not (is_formatting_only_change) }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:

    val defaultBaselines: String = "",
    val channel: String,
    val extraParameters: String = ""
) {
    per_commit(
        displayName = "Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits"
    ),
    per_day(
        displayName = "Slow Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits"
    ),
    per_week(

            List<String> changes = []
            if (operatorChanged) {
                changes.add(modifierChangeDetail("operator", newIsOperator))
            }
            if (infixChanged) {
                changes.add(modifierChangeDetail("infix", newIsInfix))
            }
            return acceptOrReject(member, changes, Violation.error(member, "Breaking Kotlin modifier change"))
        }

        return null