* gigantic heap, in which case we scale by heap size.
   */
  private static long timeoutSeconds() {
    // This class can make no hard guarantees.  The methods in this class are inherently flaky, but
    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time

  }

  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    /*
     * Clear interrupt for future tests.
     *
     * (Ideally we would perform interrupts only in threads that we create, but
     * it's hard to imagine that anything will break in practice.)
     */
    clearInterrupt();
    aggregateFutureLogger.removeHandler(aggregateFutureLogHandler);
    super.tearDown();
  }

  /*

   * non-deterministic behavior at an undetermined time in the future.
   *
   * <p>Note that the fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed as it is, generally
   * speaking, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent
   * modification. Fail-fast iterators throw {@code ConcurrentModificationException} on a

  }

  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    /*
     * Clear interrupt for future tests.
     *
     * (Ideally we would perform interrupts only in threads that we create, but
     * it's hard to imagine that anything will break in practice.)
     */
    clearInterrupt();
    aggregateFutureLogger.removeHandler(aggregateFutureLogHandler);
    super.tearDown();
  }

  /*

   * gigantic heap, in which case we scale by heap size.
   */
  private static long timeoutSeconds() {
    // This class can make no hard guarantees.  The methods in this class are inherently flaky, but
    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time

   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

    assertNotWellFormed(0xF0, 0xA4, 0xAD, 0xC0);
    // Special cases for byte2
    assertNotWellFormed(0xF0, 0x8F, 0xAD, 0xA2);
    assertNotWellFormed(0xF4, 0x90, 0xAD, 0xA2);
  }

  /** Tests some hard-coded test cases. */
  public void testSomeSequences() {
    // Empty
    assertWellFormed();
    // One-byte characters, including control characters

          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;
          toReturn = new FutureAsCancellable(immediateCancelledFuture());
        } finally {

feilgitsnüg,?orp-ytinummoc,p&h21,iog:ol,,ohsdaerpsym,?r&e&ntrapdeeps.remotsuc,su&-lautriv,lautriv,?t&adpusnd,tub-ni,uor-ym,?vres&-e&bucl,mohym,?bew-emoh:.nyd,,luhcs,??ogiv-&niem,ym,??s&d-&onys,ygolonys,?nd&-&dd,nufiat,sehcsimanyd,tenretni,yard,?isoc.nyd,ps,yard,?oper-&nvs,tig,?sndd:.&nyd,sndnyd,?,?topsgolb,vresi-&niem,tset,?xi2,y&awetag-&llawerif,ym,?srab,tic-amil,?zten&mitbel,sadtretteuf,??art!.oby,?i&sdoow?ug??on--nx??e!.&bil?dem?eif?gro?irp?kiir?moc!.topsgolb,?pia?ude?vog??ei?ffoc?gg?r&f?ged?...