* Otherwise, we'll pin it (and its result) in memory until the timeout task is GCed. (The
       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since

import com.google.common.escape.Escaper;
import com.google.common.escape.Escapers;

/**
 * {@code Escaper} instances suitable for strings to be included in XML attribute values and
 * elements' text contents. When possible, avoid manual escaping by using templating systems and
 * high-level APIs that provide autoescaping. For example, consider <a
 * href="http://www.xom.nu/">XOM</a> or <a href="http://www.jdom.org/">JDOM</a>.
 *

    return (totalLoadCount == 0) ? 0.0 : (double) totalLoadTime / totalLoadCount;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the number of times an entry has been evicted. This count does not include manual
   * {@linkplain Cache#invalidate invalidations}.
   */
  public long evictionCount() {
    return evictionCount;
  }

  /**

    return (totalLoadCount == 0) ? 0.0 : (double) totalLoadTime / totalLoadCount;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the number of times an entry has been evicted. This count does not include manual
   * {@linkplain Cache#invalidate invalidations}.
   */
  public long evictionCount() {
    return evictionCount;
  }

  /**

    }

    ImmutableSet<E> toImmutableSet() {
      if (set == null) {
        return ImmutableSet.of();
      }
      ImmutableSet<E> ret = ImmutableEnumSet.asImmutable(set);
      set = null; // subsequent manual manipulation of the accumulator mustn't affect ret
      return ret;
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible
  @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked"})
  static <E extends Comparable<? super E>>

 *
 * <p><i>Performance notes:</i>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If you only access one end of the queue, and do use a maximum size, this class will perform
 *       significantly worse than a {@code PriorityQueue} with manual eviction above the maximum
 *       size. In many cases {@link Ordering#leastOf} may work for your use case with significantly
 *       improved (and asymptotically superior) performance.

      Stopwatch s = Stopwatch.createStarted();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += s.elapsed(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
    }
    return total;
  }

  @Benchmark
  long manual(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      long start = System.nanoTime();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += (System.nanoTime() - start);
    }

      Stopwatch s = Stopwatch.createStarted();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += s.elapsed(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
    }
    return total;
  }

  @Benchmark
  long manual(int reps) {
    long total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      long start = System.nanoTime();
      // here is where you would do something
      total += (System.nanoTime() - start);
    }

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same