get() = withValidityAssertion { psi.isVar }

    override val getter: KtPropertyGetterSymbol
        get() = withValidityAssertion {
            val getter = psi.getter ?: return KtFe10PsiDefaultPropertyGetterSymbol(psi, analysisContext)
            return KtFe10PsiPropertyGetterSymbol(getter, analysisContext)
        }

    override val setter: KtPropertySetterSymbol?
        get() = withValidityAssertion {

        get() = withValidityAssertion { descriptor.setter != null }

    override val setter: KtPropertySetterSymbol?
        get() = withValidityAssertion {
            if (!descriptor.isVar) {
                return null
            }

            val setter = descriptor.setter ?: return KtFe10DescDefaultPropertySetterSymbol(descriptor, analysisContext)
            KtFe10DescPropertySetterSymbol(setter, analysisContext)
        }

  public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> {
    public Chars() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e');
    }
  }

  public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> {
    public Enums() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E);
    }
  }

  public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> {
    public Chars() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e');
    }
  }

  public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> {
    public Enums() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E);
    }
  }

* In many cases the question asked is about an imaginary solution from the user, but there might be a **better** one. If you can understand the problem and use case better, you might be able to suggest a better **alternative solution**.

* If you can't understand the question, ask for more **details**.

### Reproduce the problem

     */
    <T> Class<T> getPropertyType();

    /**
     * getterメソッドを返します。
     *
     * @return getterメソッド
     */
    Method getReadMethod();

    /**
     * getterメソッドを持っているかどうか返します。
     *
     * @return getterメソッドを持っているかどうか
     */
    boolean hasReadMethod();

    /**
     * setterメソッドを返します。
     *
     * @return setterメソッド
     */
    Method getWriteMethod();

    /**

     *            プロパティ名。{@literal null}や空文字列であってはいけません
     * @param propertyType
     *            プロパティの型。{@literal null}であってはいけません
     * @param readMethod
     *            getterメソッド
     * @param writeMethod
     *            setterメソッド
     * @param beanDesc
     *            {@link BeanDesc}。{@literal null}であってはいけません
     */

    // unless it's actually going to be used; validate() is called for all set method calls, so it
    // needs to be fast.
    // (We could instead generate the message once, when the set is created, but zero is better.)
    if (!validator.get()) {
      throw new IllegalStateException(errorMessage.get());
    }
  }

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

         * (via generateReflectiveAccessForGetter) and it is called for the private access member lowered to the getter/setter call.
         * If a private property has no getter/setter (the typical situation for simple private properties without explicitly defined
         * getter/setter) then this method is not used at all. Instead