return false;
    }

    if (!finalizeReference(firstReference, finalizeReferentMethod)) {
      return false;
    }

    /*
     * Loop as long as we have references available so as not to waste CPU looking up the Method
     * over and over again.
     */
    while (true) {
      Reference<?> furtherReference = queue.poll();
      if (furtherReference == null) {
        return true;
      }

 * either of these extremes, {@code Striped} allows the user to trade between required concurrency
 * and memory footprint. For example, if a set of tasks are CPU-bound, one could easily create a
 * very compact {@code Striped<Lock>} of {@code availableProcessors() * 4} stripes, instead of
 * possibly thousands of locks which could be created in a {@code Map<K, Lock>} structure.
 *

   * using a secondary hash (Marsaglia XorShift) to try to find a
   * free slot.
   *
   * The table size is capped because, when there are more threads
   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of

      }
    };

    public abstract Queue<Integer> create(Comparator<Integer> comparator);
  }

  /**
   * Does a CPU intensive operation on Integer and returns a BigInteger Used to implement an
   * ordering that spends a lot of cpu.
   */
  static class ExpensiveComputation implements Function<Integer, BigInteger> {
    @Override
    public BigInteger apply(Integer from) {

 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

  //   have observed 12 micros on 64-bit linux systems to wake up a parked thread). So if the
  //   timeout is small we shouldn't park(). This needs to be traded off with the cpu overhead of
  //   spinning, so we use SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS which is what AbstractQueuedSynchronizer uses for
  //   similar purposes.
  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0

 * java.util.LinkedHashMap}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@J2ktIncompatible // no support for access-order mode in LinkedHashMap delegate
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now

      return false;
    }

    if (!finalizeReference(firstReference, finalizeReferentMethod)) {
      return false;
    }

    /*
     * Loop as long as we have references available so as not to waste CPU looking up the Method
     * over and over again.
     */
    while (true) {
      Reference<?> furtherReference = queue.poll();
      if (furtherReference == null) {
        return true;
      }

 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault