such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided
that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
    stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

    b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
    whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part

func TestGetObjectInlineNotInline(t *testing.T) {
	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
	defer cancel()

	// Create a backend with 4 disks named disk{1...4}, this name convention
	// because we will unzip some object data from a sample archive.
	const numDisks = 4
	path := t.TempDir()

	var fsDirs []string
	for i := 1; i <= numDisks; i++ {

        Comparator<? super V> valueComparator) {
      @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked"})
      Entry<Object, V>[] entries = new Entry[size];
      for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        // requireNonNull is safe because the first `2*size` elements have been filled in.
        Object key = requireNonNull(alternatingKeysAndValues[2 * i]);
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

    yield request_state
    legacy_request_state_context_var.reset(contextvar_token)
```

...before this change it would raise an error when resetting the context variable, because the `contextvars` context was different, because of the way it was implemented.

            boolean runningOnCI = isRunningOnCI(cliRequest.getSystemProperties());
            if (runningOnCI) {
                slf4jLogger.info(
                        "Making this build non-interactive, because the environment variable CI equals \"true\"."
                                + " Disable this detection by removing that variable or adding --force-interactive.");
                request.setInteractiveMode(false);

  upgrading an existing pre-v1.6.4 cluster to Kubernetes v1.6.5 will cause an unintentional
  [overwrite of manual edits to GCP Health Checks](https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/842)
  managed by the GLBC Ingress Controller. This can cause the health checks to start failing,
  requiring you to reapply the manual edits.

			// Experiments (using IndexPeriodic) suggest
			// the cutover is about 16 byte skips.
			// TODO: if large prefixes of sep are matching
			// we should cutover at even larger average skips,
			// because Equal becomes that much more expensive.
			// This code does not take that effect into account.
			j := bytealg.IndexRabinKarp(s[i:], sep)
			if j < 0 {
				return -1
			}
			return i + j
		}
	}

// CppShapeInferenceResult::HandleData proto. `output` should be a resource
// or variant tensor.
// NOTE(skyewm): `proto` is passed a void*/size_t pair instead of a std::string
// because I couldn't get SWIG to work otherwise.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TF_SetHandleShapeAndType(TF_Graph* graph,
                                                    TF_Output output,

`async def`를 사용하면, 파이썬은 해당 함수 내에서 `await` 표현에 주의해야한다는 사실과, 해당 함수의 실행을 "일시정지"⏸하고 다시 돌아오기 전까지 다른 작업을 수행🔀할 수 있다는 것을 알게됩니다.

`async def`f 함수를 호출하고자 할 때, "대기"해야합니다. 따라서, 아래는 동작하지 않습니다.

```Python
# This won't work, because get_burgers was defined with: async def
burgers = get_burgers(2)
```

---

따라서, `await`f를 사용해서 호출할 수 있는 라이브러리를 사용한다면, 다음과 같이 `async def`를 사용하는 *경로 작동 함수*를 생성해야 합니다:

```Python hl_lines="2-3"

    @Override
    public @Nullable Object[] toArray() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        /*
         * toArrayImpl returns `@Nullable Object[]` rather than `Object[]` but only because it can
         * be used with collections that may contain null. This collection never contains nulls, so
         * we could return `Object[]`. But this class is private and J2KT cannot change return types