t.Run(testCase.expectedOutput, func(t *testing.T) {
			gotOutput := ISO8601Format(testCase.date)
			t.Log("Go", testCase.date.Format(iso8601TimeFormat))
			if gotOutput != testCase.expectedOutput {
				t.Errorf("Expected %s, got %s", testCase.expectedOutput, gotOutput)
			}
		})
	}

the behavior you are seeing is confirmed as a bug or issue, it can easily be re-raised in the issue tracker.

## Filing issues

Sensitive security-related issues should be reported to [******@****.***](mailto:******@****.***).
See the [security policy](https://golang.org/security) for details.

The recommended way to file an issue is by running `go bug`.

  /**
   * Constructs an empty {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with enough capacity to hold the specified
   * numbers of keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys
   * @param expectedValuesPerKey the expected average number of values per key
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} or {@code expectedValuesPerKey} is
   *     negative
   */

  /**
   * Constructs an empty {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with enough capacity to hold the specified
   * numbers of keys and values without rehashing.
   *
   * @param expectedKeys the expected number of distinct keys
   * @param expectedValuesPerKey the expected average number of values per key
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} or {@code expectedValuesPerKey} is
   *     negative
   */

 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * {@snippet :

			continue
		}
		shuffledDisks[meta.Erasure.Index-1] = disks[i]
		shuffledPartsMetadata[meta.Erasure.Index-1] = metaArr[i]
	}

	// Inconsistent meta info is with in the limit of
	// expected quorum, proceed with EcIndex based
	// disk order.
	if inconsistent < fi.Erasure.ParityBlocks {
		return shuffledDisks, shuffledPartsMetadata
	}

	// fall back to original distribution based order.

              allowed_warnings_regex:
                - "added allowed warning regex .* [0-9]"
          - match: {}
        """.stripIndent()).readAll()

        expectedAll.eachWithIndex{ ObjectNode expected, int i ->
            if(expected != actual.get(i)) {
                println("\nTransformed Test:")
                SequenceWriter sequenceWriter = WRITER.writeValues(System.out)
                for (ObjectNode transformedTest : actual) {

      return null;
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Doubles.tryParse
  private static void checkTryParse(String input) {
    Double expected = referenceTryParse(input);
    assertThat(Doubles.tryParse(input)).isEqualTo(expected);
    if (expected != null && !Doubles.FLOATING_POINT_PATTERN.matcher(input).matches()) {
      // TODO(cpovirk): Use SourceCodeEscapers if it is added to Guava.

public class CollectionStreamTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * We're not really testing the implementation of Stream, only that we're getting a Stream
   * that corresponds to the expected elements.
   */

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testStreamToArrayUnknownOrder() {
    Helpers.assertEqualIgnoringOrder(getSampleElements(), asList(collection.stream().toArray()));
  }

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests that {@link AggregateFutureState} uses the expected {@code AtomicHelper} implementation.
 *
 * <p>We have more thorough testing of {@code AtomicHelper} implementations in {@link
 * AggregateFutureStateFallbackAtomicHelperTest}. The advantage to this test is that it can run