用以下指令執行測試：

<div class="termy">

```console
$ pytest

================ test session starts ================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.9, pytest-5.3.5, py-1.8.1, pluggy-0.13.1
rootdir: /home/user/code/superawesome-cli/app
plugins: forked-1.1.3, xdist-1.31.0, cov-2.8.1
collected 6 items

---> 100%

test_main.py <span style="color: green; white-space: pre;">......                            [100%]</span>

执行测试：

<div class="termy">

```console
$ pytest

================ test session starts ================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.9, pytest-5.3.5, py-1.8.1, pluggy-0.13.1
rootdir: /home/user/code/superawesome-cli/app
plugins: forked-1.1.3, xdist-1.31.0, cov-2.8.1
collected 6 items

---> 100%

test_main.py <span style="color: green; white-space: pre;">......                            [100%]</span>

			}
		})
	}
}

// In some deployments, one object has data inlined in one disk and not inlined in other disks.
func TestGetObjectInlineNotInline(t *testing.T) {
	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(t.Context())
	defer cancel()

	// Create a backend with 4 disks named disk{1...4}, this name convention
	// because we will unzip some object data from a sample archive.
	const numDisks = 4

        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(
                rowFunction.apply(input),

        assertArrayEquals(encryptionKey, serverData.encryptionKey);
        assertEquals("", serverData.oemDomainName);
    }

    @Test
    void testToString() {
        // Populate serverData with some values
        response.dialectIndex = 5;
        serverData.securityMode = 0x03; // User, Encrypted
        serverData.security = 1;
        serverData.encryptedPasswords = true;
        serverData.maxMpxCount = 10;

        All that, on top of all the incredible help provided by a bunch of community members, the [FastAPI Experts](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/fastapi-people/#experts), that give a lot of their time to come here and help others.

        That's a lot of work they are doing, but if more FastAPI users came to help others like them just a little bit more, it would be much less effort for them (and you and me 😅).

  TFE_TensorHandle* h1_task0 = TestMatrixTensorHandle(ctx);
  std::vector<TFE_TensorHandle*> handles_task0;
  if (heavy_load_on_streaming_rpc) {
    // Send 50 tensor copy requests to simulate that there have been some RPC
    // requests been enqueued.
    for (int i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
      handles_task0.push_back(TestMatrixTensorHandle(ctx));
    }
  }
  const char task1_name[] = "/job:localhost/replica:0/task:1/device:CPU:0";

 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.
 *

 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.
 *